zoukankan      html  css  js  c++  java
  • [RxJS + AngularJS] Sync Requests with RxJS and Angular

    When you implement a search bar, the user can make several different queries in a row. With a Promise based implementation, the displayed result would be what the longest promise returns. This is the problem which we want to solve.

    <!DOCTYPE html>
    <html>
    <head>
    <script src="https://cdn.rawgit.com/lodash/lodash/3.0.1/lodash.min.js"></script>
    <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/less.js/1.3.3/less.min.js"></script>
    <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/rxjs/2.3.22/rx.all.js"></script>
    <script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.4.0/angular.min.js"></script>
      <meta charset="utf-8">
      <title>JS Bin</title>
    </head>
    <body ng-app="APP">
      <div>
        <p>Click on "Pets" then on "Nothing" in each form</p>
        <p>Because pets' promise take long to resolve (longer than nothing's), it ends up with inconsistent output in Basic setup: nothing should be displayed but pets arrive!</p>
        <p>RxJs is an elegant way to prevent this concurrency problems from appearing.</p>
      </div>
      <div ng-controller="StandardController as standard" style="margin-top:50px;">
        <p>Basic setup</p>
        <input id="s-pets" name="standardEntityType" type="radio" ng-model="standard.filters.entityType" value="pets"> 
        <label for="s-pets">Pets</label>
    
        <input id="s-colors" name="standardEntityType" type="radio" ng-model="standard.filters.entityType" value="colors">
        <label for="s-colors">Colors</label>
        
        <input id="s-nothing" name="standardEntityType" type="radio" ng-model="standard.filters.entityType" value="nothing"> 
        <label for="s-nothing">Nothing</label>
    
        <p>
          {{ standard.filters | json }}
        </p>
        <ul>
          <li ng-repeat="entity in standard.entities">
            {{ entity.name }}
          </li>
        </ul>
      </div>
    </body>
    </html>
    console.clear();
    
    angular.module('APP', [])
    
    .service('dataService', function($q, $timeout, $rootScope){
      var colors = [
        { name: 'red'   },
        { name: 'blue'  },
        { name: 'white' }
      ];
      
      var pets = [
        { name: 'cat' },
        { name: 'dog' }
      ];
    
      function fakeAjax(returnValue, delay){
        return $q(function(resolve){
          $timeout(function() {
            resolve(returnValue);
          }, delay);      
        });
      }
      
      function getColors(){
        return fakeAjax(colors, 1500);
      }
    
      function getPets(){
        return fakeAjax(pets, 3000);
      }
      
      function nullResponse(){
        return fakeAjax([], 1);
      }
      
      var mapping = {
        colors: getColors,
        pets:   getPets
      };
          
      return {
        getEntities: function(type){
          if (mapping[type])
            return mapping[type]();
          else
            return nullResponse();
        }
      };
    })
    
    .controller('StandardController', function($scope, dataService){
      this.entities = [];
      this.filters = {};
      var controller = this;
      
      function searchEntities(type){
        dataService.getEntities(type)
          .then(function(entities){
            controller.entities = entities;
          });
      }
      
      $scope.$watch(function(){ 
        return controller.filters.entityType;
      }, function(newVal){
        searchEntities(newVal);
      });
    });

    Solution 1: Add lodash _.debounce method to add some delay.

    .controller('StandardController', function($scope, dataService){
      this.entities = [];
      this.filters = {};
      var controller = this;
      
      function _searchEntities(type){
        dataService.getEntities(type)
          .then(function(entities){
            controller.entities = entities;
          });
      }
      
      var searchEntities = _.debounce(_searchEntities, 1500);
      $scope.$watch(function(){ 
        return controller.filters.entityType;
      }, function(newVal){
        searchEntities(newVal);
      });
    });

     The problem here is we have to assume a correct time. Too long, and the UI is not responsible enough, and too short, and we may encounter weirdness again.

    Solution 2: Using RxJS

    .controller('StandardController', function($scope, dataService){
      this.entities = [];
      this.filters = {};
      var controller = this;
      
      var Observable = Rx.Observable;
      var source = Observable.create(function(observe){
          $scope.$watch(function(){ 
            return controller.filters.entityType;
          }, function(newType){
            observe.onNext(newType);
          });
      }).flatMapLatest(function(type){
          return Observable.fromPromise(dataService.getEntities(type));
      });
      
      var sub = source.subscribe(function(entities){
        controller.entities = entities;
      });
    });

     No matter what order we click the radio buttons, we'll always get the expected outcome. RxJS will handle that for us. The main benefit of RxJS over mere promises is we always get the latest query results. You can see, this implementation of Rx has a way to cancel promises.

    Two methos to apply:

    .controller('StandardController', function($scope, dataService){
      this.entities = [];
      this.filters = {};
      var controller = this;
      
      var Observable = Rx.Observable;
      var source = Observable.create(function(observe){
          $scope.$watch(function(){ 
            return controller.filters.entityType;
          }, function(newType){
            observe.onNext(newType);
          });
      }).debounce(500).flatMapLatest(function(type){
          return Observable.fromPromise(dataService.getEntities(type));
      });
      
      var sub = source.subscribe(function(entities){
        controller.entities = entities;
      });
      
      $scope.$on('destory', function(){
        sub.dispose();
      });
    
    });

    The first thing is to clean after yourself. On each destroy event on the scope, so basically, whenever you use a router, it could be on route change, you have to dispose the listener so Rx knows it can get rid of everything linked to it.

    The second thing is we don't want to put too much pressure on our server, so we are going to use debounce again. It's very important to understand here that debounce is not a way to avoid UI issues. It's a way to avoid useless server queries.

  • 相关阅读:
    [Vue] Computed property "XXX" was assigned to but it has no setter.
    vue路由传参的三种基本方式
    ECharts大屏数据可视化展板项目 适配rem
    vue-cli3.0结合lib-flexible、px2rem实现适配,完美解决第三方ui库样式变小问题
    element-ui 实现行合并-亲测有效!
    ui自动化用Tesseract类截取和识别验证码【多测师】
    史上最全软件测试工程师常见的面试题总结(一)【多测师】
    Python操作非关系型数据库Redis【多测师】
    Java当中的重载和重写的区别【多测师】
    3道经典的Python练习题【多测师】
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/Answer1215/p/4844925.html
Copyright © 2011-2022 走看看