zoukankan      html  css  js  c++  java
  • [转]关于System.IServiceProvider的探讨

    以下内容转自论坛http://bytes.com/topic/c-sharp/answers/245720-iserviceprovider-why-does-interface-exist

    Kjetil,

    See inline.

    "Kjetil Bjerknes" <kb@trollsoft.com> wrote in message
    news:1f69b085.0405120837.14f9e0d0@posting.google.c om...[color=blue]
    > I'm currently creating some user controls in C#, and I've come across
    > the interface IServiceProvider. This interface must be one of the
    > worst examples of bad design I've ever seen. It contains one single
    > method, with the following signature:
    >
    > object GetService(Type serviceType);
    >
    > Can anyone tell be what this method is supposed to do? OK, I can see
    > that it's supposed to return a "service", but what exactly is a
    > service? According to the method signature it can be absolutely
    > everything, and the interface could just as well be called
    > IObjectRetriever.[/color]

    A "service" here is functionality that the site provides which might not
    necessarily be implemented by the container itself. For example, say that
    the container offers a logging service. If the id (in this case the type)
    for the "service" is well known, then the site can return the "service"
    (read: object) that provides the expected functionality. Expecting the site
    itself prevents the architecture from being pluggable.
    [color=blue]
    >
    > To make matters worse, this interface is implemented/extended by a
    > number of classes and other interfaces, and none of them seem to think
    > it's important to inform what kind of services they return![/color]

    I agree with you here. It would be helpful if there was an extra method
    indicating the services that it provides. Since the number of services it
    provides are potentially limitless, it is impossible to cycle through all
    the known types, passing them to GetService to see what returns null and
    what does not.
    [color=blue]
    >
    > Why not create the following interface while we're at it, and let
    > every object implement it :). Then we wouldn't need to add all those
    > stupid methods with descriptive names:
    >
    > public interface IIronicTask {
    > object DoIronicTask(int taskID, object[] args);
    > }
    >
    >
    > __Please__ enlighten me if you're able to see the usefulness of
    > IServiceProvider! Or even better, if you know of some way to learn
    > what services it can provide. For now I'm particularly interested in
    > services that can be returned from ISite.GetService(),
    > Component.GetService() and the IServiceProvider parameter of
    > UITypeEditor.EditValue().[/color]

    IServiceProvider is very, very valuable if you want to actually enable
    the idea of a pluggable architecture. I think you bring up a good point
    about being able to provide a list of ^what^ services it provides.
    [color=blue]
    >
    > As a side note: It seems that System.ComponentModel.Component does not
    > implement IServiceProvider, however it does have a GetService()
    > method(?). The more I get into C# and the class library, words like
    > inconsistent and unintuitive seems to spring to mind a bit to often.[/color]

    GetService is meant as a helper method for classes that derive from
    Component. It basically gets the site from the component and calls
    GetService from that. It's shorthand for:

    (this.Site == null ? null : this.Site.GetService(type));

    Hope this helps.


    --
    - Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
    - mvp@spam.guard.caspershouse.com
    [color=blue]
    >
    >
    > </KB>[/color]

  • 相关阅读:
    HttpClient
    spring入门
    morphia进阶
    morphia基本API方法
    mangodb数据库框架morphia注解
    学与思
    解决vscode执行yarn启动项目报错
    使用swiper+动画实现轮播图自动播放
    vue中使用el-tree实现一行显示多条数据
    使用git命令提交部分修改代码
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/ChenZB/p/1742948.html
Copyright © 2011-2022 走看看