// 本文部分内容来自网络
// 基于内核版本3.4
发生Data Abort异常后，ARM处理器首先根据向量表找到对应异常入口，向量表位于arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S:
.globl __vectors_start __vectors_start: ARM( swi SYS_ERROR0 ) THUMB( svc #0 ) THUMB( nop ) W(b) vector_und + stubs_offset W(ldr) pc, .LCvswi + stubs_offset W(b) vector_pabt + stubs_offset W(b) vector_dabt + stubs_offset W(b) vector_addrexcptn + stubs_offset W(b) vector_irq + stubs_offset W(b) vector_fiq + stubs_offset .globl __vectors_end
对于data abort，对应的跳转地址是vector_dabt + stubs_offset。这个地址的指令定义也在entry-armv.S
/* * Data abort dispatcher * Enter in ABT mode, spsr = USR CPSR, lr = USR PC */ vector_stub dabt, ABT_MODE, 8 .long __dabt_usr @ 0 (USR_26 / USR_32) .long __dabt_invalid @ 1 (FIQ_26 / FIQ_32) .long __dabt_invalid @ 2 (IRQ_26 / IRQ_32) .long __dabt_svc @ 3 (SVC_26 / SVC_32) .long __dabt_invalid @ 4 .long __dabt_invalid @ 5 .long __dabt_invalid @ 6 .long __dabt_invalid @ 7 .long __dabt_invalid @ 8 .long __dabt_invalid @ 9 .long __dabt_invalid @ a .long __dabt_invalid @ b .long __dabt_invalid @ c .long __dabt_invalid @ d .long __dabt_invalid @ e .long __dabt_invalid @ f
怎么将vector_dabt + stubs_offset和上述代码对应起来呢？将vector_stub的宏定义展开就能看出：
/*
* Vector stubs.
*
* This code is copied to 0xffff0200 so we can use branches in the
* vectors, rather than ldr's. Note that this code must not
* exceed 0x300 bytes.
*
* Common stub entry macro:
* Enter in IRQ mode, spsr = SVC/USR CPSR, lr = SVC/USR PC
*
* SP points to a minimal amount of processor-private memory, the address
* of which is copied into r0 for the mode specific abort handler.
*/
.macro vector_stub, name, mode, correction=0
.align 5
vector_
ame:
.if correction
sub lr, lr, #correction
.endif
@
@ Save r0, lr_<exception> (parent PC) and spsr_<exception>
@ (parent CPSR)
@
stmia sp, {r0, lr} @ save r0, lr
mrs lr, spsr @保存跳转之前的CPSR到lr寄存器
str lr, [sp, #8] @ save spsr
@
@ Prepare for SVC32 mode. IRQs remain disabled.
@
mrs r0, cpsr
eor r0, r0, #(mode ^ SVC_MODE | PSR_ISETSTATE)
msr spsr_cxsf, r0 @准备进入svc模式
@
@ the branch table must immediately follow this code
@
and lr, lr, #0x0f @得到跳转前所处的模式（usr、svr等）
THUMB( adr r0, 1f )
THUMB( ldr lr, [r0, lr, lsl #2] )
mov r0, sp
ARM( ldr lr, [pc, lr, lsl #2] ) @根据模式跳转到相应的data abort指令，并进入svc模式
movs pc, lr @ branch to handler in SVC mode
ENDPROC(vector_
ame)
.align 2
@ handler addresses follow this label
1:
.endm
对于同一个异常，根据进入异常之前所处的模式，会跳转到不同的指令分支，这些指令分支紧跟在vector_stub宏定义的后面。如果进入data abort之前处于usr模式，那么跳转到__dabt_usr；如果处于svc模式，那么跳转到__dabt_svc；否则跳转到__dabt_invalid。 实际上，进入异常向量前Linux只能处于usr或者svc两种模式之一。这时因为irq等异常在跳转表中都要经过vector_stub宏，而不管之前是哪种状态，这个宏都会将CPU状态改为svc模式。 usr模式即Linux中的用户态模式，svc即内核模式。
__dabt_svc流程，调用dabt_helper继续：
__dabt_svc:
svc_entry
mov r2, sp
dabt_helper
@
@ IRQs off again before pulling preserved data off the stack
@
disable_irq_notrace
#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
tst r5, #PSR_I_BIT
bleq trace_hardirqs_on
tst r5, #PSR_I_BIT
blne trace_hardirqs_off
#endif
svc_exit r5 @ return from exception
UNWIND(.fnend )
ENDPROC(__dabt_svc)
dabt_helper流程，调用CPU_DABORT_HANDLER继续：
.macro dabt_helper
@
@ Call the processor-specific abort handler:
@
@ r2 - pt_regs
@ r4 - aborted context pc
@ r5 - aborted context psr
@
@ The abort handler must return the aborted address in r0, and
@ the fault status register in r1. r9 must be preserved.
@
#ifdef MULTI_DABORT
ldr ip, .LCprocfns
mov lr, pc
ldr pc, [ip, #PROCESSOR_DABT_FUNC]
#else
bl CPU_DABORT_HANDLER
#endif
.endm
#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES
.section .kprobes.text,"ax",%progbits
#else
.text
#endif
CPU_DABORT_HANDLER是一个宏定义，以armv6架构为例，最终函数为v6_early_abort
# define CPU_DABORT_HANDLER v6_early_abort
v6_early_abort：
首先读取DFSR和DFAR两个协处理寄存器，保存在R1和R0中，然后调用do_DataAbort进入C语言环境：
ENTRY(v6_early_abort) mrc p15, 0, r1, c5, c0, 0 @ get FSR mrc p15, 0, r0, c6, c0, 0 @ get FAR b do_DataAbort
DFSR：失效状态寄存器，Data Fault Status Register -> R1: fsr
DFAR：失效地址寄存器，Data Fault Address Register ->R0:addr
do_DataAbort：
asmlinkage void __exception
do_DataAbort(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
const struct fsr_info *inf = fsr_info + fsr_fs(fsr);
struct siginfo info;
if (!inf->fn(addr, fsr & ~FSR_LNX_PF, regs))
return;
printk(KERN_ALERT "Unhandled fault: %s (0x%03x) at 0x%08lx
",
inf->name, fsr, addr);
info.si_signo = inf->sig;
info.si_errno = 0;
info.si_code = inf->code;
info.si_addr = (void __user *)addr;
arm_notify_die("", regs, &info, fsr, 0);
}
const struct fsr_info *inf = fsr_info + fsr_fs(fsr):
根据FSR的状态值，查询fsr_info表，得到相应处理函数与信号值。
struct fsr_info {
int (*fn)(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr, struct pt_regs *regs);
int sig;
int code;
const char *name;
};
static struct fsr_info fsr_info[] = {
{ do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "unknown 0" },
{ do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "unknown 1" },
{ do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "unknown 2" },
{ do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "unknown 3" },
{ do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "reserved translation fault" },
{ do_translation_fault, SIGSEGV, SEGV_MAPERR, "level 1 translation fault" },
{ do_translation_fault, SIGSEGV, SEGV_MAPERR, "level 2 translation fault" },
{ do_page_fault, SIGSEGV, SEGV_MAPERR, "level 3 translation fault" },
{ do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "reserved access flag fault" },
{ do_bad, SIGSEGV, SEGV_ACCERR, "level 1 access flag fault" },
{ do_bad, SIGSEGV, SEGV_ACCERR, "level 2 access flag fault" },
{ do_page_fault, SIGSEGV, SEGV_ACCERR, "level 3 access flag fault" },
......
fsr_info数组列出了常见的地址失效处理方案，例如do_page_fault处理缺页中断，do_translation_fault处理转换错误，其他不能处理的默认为do_bad:
static int
do_bad(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
return 1;
}
do_bad不做任何处理，返回1后再调用arm_notify_die后处理：
void arm_notify_die(const char *str, struct pt_regs *regs,
struct siginfo *info, unsigned long err, unsigned long trap)
{
if (user_mode(regs)) {
current->thread.error_code = err;
current->thread.trap_no = trap;
force_sig_info(info->si_signo, info, current);
} else {
die(str, regs, err);
}
}
arm_notify_die函数判断当前处于Kernel模式还是User模式，如果是Kernel模式直接die，如果是User模式，调用force_sig_info向进程强制发送fsr_info表中对应信号，强制发送信号可以忽略信号处理的SIG_IGN标记，和stask_struct的blocked域。进程收到信号后，接着进行coredump等流程。