zoukankan      html  css  js  c++  java
  • [WPF系列-高级TemplateBinding vs RelativeSource TemplatedParent]

    What is the difference between these 2 bindings:

    <ControlTemplate TargetType="{x:Type Button}">
       <Border BorderBrush="{TemplateBinding Property=Background}">
          <ContentPresenter />
       </Border>
    </ControlTemplate>

    and

    <ControlTemplate TargetType="{x:Type Button}">
       <Border BorderBrush="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource TemplatedParent}, Path=Background}">
          <ContentPresenter />
       </Border>
    </ControlTemplate>

    TemplateBinding - More limiting than using regular Binding

    • More efficient than a Binding but it has less functionality
    • Only works inside a ControlTemplate's visual tree
    • Doesn't work with properties on Freezables
    • Doesn't work within a ControlTemplate's Trigger
    • Provides a shortcut in setting properties(not as verbose),e.g. {TemplateBinding targetProperty}

    Regular Binding - Does not have above limitations of TemplateBinding

    • Respects Parent Properties
    • Resets Target Values to clear out any explicitly set values
    • Example: <Ellipse Fill="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource TemplatedParent},Path=Background}"/>

    One more thing - TemplateBindings don't allow value converting. They don't allow you to pass a Converter and don't automatically convert int to string for example (which is normal for a Binding).

    TempleteBinding is a shorthand for Binding with TemplatedParent but it does not expose all the capabilities of the Binding class, for example you can't control Binding.Mode from TempleteBinding.

    参考

    WPF TemplateBinding vs RelativeSource TemplatedParent

  • 相关阅读:
    如何解决js跨域问题
    前端开发群推荐:鬼懿IT
    Highcharts中文API详解
    搜索弹层交互
    js中判断Object、Array、Function等引用类型对象是否相等的方法
    各种之父
    UNIX简介
    MATLAB二维正态分布图
    Albert Einstein says
    GNU简介
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/HQFZ/p/4169874.html
Copyright © 2011-2022 走看看