zoukankan      html  css  js  c++  java
  • [WPF系列-高级TemplateBinding vs RelativeSource TemplatedParent]

    What is the difference between these 2 bindings:

    <ControlTemplate TargetType="{x:Type Button}">
       <Border BorderBrush="{TemplateBinding Property=Background}">
          <ContentPresenter />
       </Border>
    </ControlTemplate>

    and

    <ControlTemplate TargetType="{x:Type Button}">
       <Border BorderBrush="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource TemplatedParent}, Path=Background}">
          <ContentPresenter />
       </Border>
    </ControlTemplate>

    TemplateBinding - More limiting than using regular Binding

    • More efficient than a Binding but it has less functionality
    • Only works inside a ControlTemplate's visual tree
    • Doesn't work with properties on Freezables
    • Doesn't work within a ControlTemplate's Trigger
    • Provides a shortcut in setting properties(not as verbose),e.g. {TemplateBinding targetProperty}

    Regular Binding - Does not have above limitations of TemplateBinding

    • Respects Parent Properties
    • Resets Target Values to clear out any explicitly set values
    • Example: <Ellipse Fill="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource TemplatedParent},Path=Background}"/>

    One more thing - TemplateBindings don't allow value converting. They don't allow you to pass a Converter and don't automatically convert int to string for example (which is normal for a Binding).

    TempleteBinding is a shorthand for Binding with TemplatedParent but it does not expose all the capabilities of the Binding class, for example you can't control Binding.Mode from TempleteBinding.

    参考

    WPF TemplateBinding vs RelativeSource TemplatedParent

  • 相关阅读:
    异星觉醒观后感
    Word加密功能
    mysql基础
    Java学习笔记二—Java语法
    Java学习笔记一
    红帽考试学习第二十记
    红帽考试学习第十九记
    红帽考试学习第十八记
    红帽考试学习第十七记
    红帽考试学习第十六记
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/HQFZ/p/4169874.html
Copyright © 2011-2022 走看看