zoukankan      html  css  js  c++  java
  • [WPF系列-高级TemplateBinding vs RelativeSource TemplatedParent]

    What is the difference between these 2 bindings:

    <ControlTemplate TargetType="{x:Type Button}">
       <Border BorderBrush="{TemplateBinding Property=Background}">
          <ContentPresenter />
       </Border>
    </ControlTemplate>

    and

    <ControlTemplate TargetType="{x:Type Button}">
       <Border BorderBrush="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource TemplatedParent}, Path=Background}">
          <ContentPresenter />
       </Border>
    </ControlTemplate>

    TemplateBinding - More limiting than using regular Binding

    • More efficient than a Binding but it has less functionality
    • Only works inside a ControlTemplate's visual tree
    • Doesn't work with properties on Freezables
    • Doesn't work within a ControlTemplate's Trigger
    • Provides a shortcut in setting properties(not as verbose),e.g. {TemplateBinding targetProperty}

    Regular Binding - Does not have above limitations of TemplateBinding

    • Respects Parent Properties
    • Resets Target Values to clear out any explicitly set values
    • Example: <Ellipse Fill="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource TemplatedParent},Path=Background}"/>

    One more thing - TemplateBindings don't allow value converting. They don't allow you to pass a Converter and don't automatically convert int to string for example (which is normal for a Binding).

    TempleteBinding is a shorthand for Binding with TemplatedParent but it does not expose all the capabilities of the Binding class, for example you can't control Binding.Mode from TempleteBinding.

    参考

    WPF TemplateBinding vs RelativeSource TemplatedParent

  • 相关阅读:
    三、thinkphp
    二、thinkphp
    一、thinkphp
    层次数据结构字符串处理,split函数使用
    jquery div层级选择器
    css ul li 制作导航条
    个人Android作品开发——FinancePad记账通
    springMVC+ibatis数据持久化入门级学习例子
    java reflect 例子
    java给图片加水印代码
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/HQFZ/p/4169874.html
Copyright © 2011-2022 走看看