同一段SQL语句,因表的索引中的 不同数据类型字段的顺序,进而产生不一样的结果及执行时间
select count(1) as totalcount from (SELECT * FROM ( select distinct sa.ProjectTypeCode, active.Id,active.ContractorId,active.CompanyName,active.CooperationTypes ,active.PeriodID,'' PeriodName ,active.Annex,active.IsMark ,active.MainContacts, active.AddressAndTel, active.LastModificationTime, active.ContractorEmployeeId,active.SprPlanDetailId,active.SPRCompleteDetailId , active.SprReportId from serviceActivities sa with (nolock) join ReportBusinessCooperation active with (nolock) on sa.ServiceActivitieId = active.Id and sa.IsDeleted=0 and active.IsDeleted=0 and sa.ProjectTypeCode=26 and (1=1) AND sa.BehaviorHappenDate <= '2021/3/31 0:00:00' and sa.BehaviorEndDate >='2021/1/1 0:00:00' AND sa.ContractorId = 'f7368068-51db-c04e-d81d-39e7ccb79202' AND sa.SprReportId = '-1' and sa.SprPlanDetailId ='-1' and sa.SPRCompleteDetailId ='-1' and sa.ContractorId='f7368068-51db-c04e-d81d-39e7ccb79202' join (select * from ServiceActivitiesProductRelation aps where 1=1 and exists ( select uu.id from [ServiceActivitiesProductRelation] uu where '66bcd5c4-fb4f-3eb3-6df1-39f58512a4bf,10f2f9e9-94b4-c6bf-6856-39f41ee11b5c,-1' like '%'+uu.ProductId+'%' and '1decb0bd-347b-8715-736b-39f58515f6c7,26882107-fb33-04bf-61a6-39f422c2bf13,-1' like '%'+uu.ProductFormatId+'%' and uu.id=aps.id ) ) rela on sa.id= rela.ParentId and rela.IsDeleted=0 join ( select * from PersonalAgreementShips aps where 1=1 and exists( select id from( select t.id, b.prov from( select cspemp.id, convert(xml, '<root><v>' + replace(cspemp.Province, ',', '</v><v>') + '</v></root>') as prov from PersonalAgreementShips cspemp with(nolock) where cspemp.ContractorID = 'f7368068-51db-c04e-d81d-39e7ccb79202' and cspemp.CSPId='0b94ac99-d9fd-2dff-8b2a-39f22f015e46' )t outer apply (select C.v.value('.', 'nvarchar(36)')prov from t.prov.nodes('/root/v')C(v)) b )conempprov join ( select b.prov from( select convert(xml, '<root><v>' + replace('100000',',', '</v><v>') + '</v></root>') as prov ) t outer apply ( select C.v.value('.','nvarchar(36)') prov from t.prov.nodes('/root/v')C(v))b ) planprov on conempprov.prov = planprov.prov OR conempprov.prov = '100000' OR planprov.prov = '100000' where conempprov.Id = aps.Id ) ) perag on sa.ContractorEmployeeId=perag.ContractorEmployeeId and perag.IsDeleted=0 ) availabledata WHERE 1=1 AND availabledata.ContractorId='f7368068-51db-c04e-d81d-39e7ccb79202' ) tab_num
表中索引的排列顺序:
SQL语句的查询结果:
更改表中索引字段的排列顺序:
对比两图 表serviceActivities 的扫描次数也不尽相同(虽然逻辑读取次数多,但扫描次数少),进而影响了SQL语句的查询速率。
结论:
- 表的“扫描次数”与“表的逻辑读取次数”对表查询速度的影响,“扫描次数” >"逻辑读取次数"。
- 在加过索引的表中数据类型排列顺序:数字类型的索引查找效率高于字符串类型 ;数字类型或值类型>定长字符串(char、nchar)>变长字符串(varchar、nvarchar),
以上皆是自己通过查询结果自己总结归纳,如有错误欢迎指点修改。以免误人子弟。