zoukankan      html  css  js  c++  java
  • golang与node.js的http对比测试

    注:本文对于新版本的golang并不使用,go1以后go的性能已经有了比较好的提升,具体测试见: http://www.cnblogs.com/QLeelulu/archive/2012/08/12/2635261.html

    听说Go是很不错的语言,了解了一下,一些特性确实很不错。

    顺便测试了一下http与node.js的性能对比。

    go的代码:

    image
    (注:是用8g, 8l编译的)

    node.js的代码:

    image

    ab测试结果:

    ==** GO **==

    $ ab -c 100 -n 1000 http://127.0.0.1:8080/
    This is ApacheBench
    , Version 2.3<$Revision: 655654$>

    Server Software:
    Server Hostname:
    127.0.0.1
    Server Port:
    8080

    Document
    Path: /
    Document Length:
    1 bytes

    Concurrency Level:
    100
    Time taken for tests: 0.322 seconds
    Complete requests:
    1000
    Failed requests:
    0
    Write errors:
    0
    Total transferred:
    97000 bytes
    HTML transferred:
    1000 bytes
    Requests per second:
    3105.62 [#/sec] (mean)
    Time per request: 32.200 [ms] (mean)
    Time per request: 0.322 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
    Transfer rate:
    294.18 [Kbytes/sec] received

    Connection Times
    (ms)
    min mean[
    +/-sd] median max
    Connect:
    000.703
    Processing:
    13010.52955
    Waiting:
    13010.52955
    Total:
    43010.12955

    ==** Node.js **==

    $ ab -c 100 -n 1000 http://127.0.0.1:8080/
    This is ApacheBench
    , Version 2.3<$Revision: 655654$>

    Server Software:
    Server Hostname:
    127.0.0.1
    Server Port:
    8080

    Document
    Path: /
    Document Length:
    12 bytes

    Concurrency Level:
    100
    Time taken for tests: 0.143 seconds
    Complete requests:
    1000
    Failed requests:
    0
    Write errors:
    0
    Total transferred:
    50000 bytes
    HTML transferred:
    12000 bytes
    Requests per second:
    6993.50 [#/sec] (mean)
    Time per request: 14.299 [ms] (mean)
    Time per request: 0.143 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
    Transfer rate:
    341.48 [Kbytes/sec] received

    Connection Times
    (ms)
    min mean[
    +/-sd] median max
    Connect:
    001.104
    Processing:
    2136.61330
    Waiting:
    2136.61330
    Total:
    2146.41430

    webbench测试结果

    ==** GO **==

    $ webbench -t 30 -c 100 http://127.0.0.1:8080/
    Webbench - Simple Web Benchmark
    1.5
    Copyright
    (c) Radim Kolar 1997-2004, GPL Open Source Software.

    Benchmarking: GET http:
    //127.0.0.1:8080/
    100 clients, running 30 sec.

    Speed
    =146934 pages/min, 262032 bytes/sec.
    Requests:
    73467 susceed,0 failed.

    ==** Node.js **==

    $ webbench -t 30 -c 100 http://127.0.0.1:8080/
    Webbench - Simple Web Benchmark
    1.5
    Copyright
    (c) Radim Kolar 1997-2004, GPL Open Source Software.

    Benchmarking: GET http:
    //127.0.0.1:8080/
    100 clients, running 30 sec.

    Speed
    =485128 pages/min, 404273 bytes/sec.
    Requests:
    242564 susceed,0 failed.

    从测试结果来看,node.js的HTTP SERVER性能是Go的两倍还多,而且让我比较郁闷的是,在用webbench进行测试的时候,可以看到go是用了我的笔记本上的四个核的CPU的,而node.js当然是只跑在一个核上,而Go居然还比node.js慢这么多。

    然后我google,就看到:golang helloworld 45% slower than node.js

    求真相!

    作者:QLeelulu Follow QLeelulu on Twitter
    出处:http://QLeelulu.cnblogs.com/
    本文版权归作者和博客园共有,欢迎转载,但未经作者同意必须保留此段声明,且在文章页面明显位置给出原文连接,否则保留追究法律责任的权利
  • 相关阅读:
    okHttp源码解析------待续
    AS: Unsupported method: AndroidProject.getPluginGeneration().
    vue项目根据不同环境调用不同请求地址
    文字跑马灯(无缝衔接) CSS+JS完美实现
    data 和 computed 的区别
    ES6解构赋值
    flex布局
    token验证
    vue组件传值
    vue钩子函数
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/QLeelulu/p/2170204.html
Copyright © 2011-2022 走看看