分析原因:新建彩信草稿,保存后,再打开草稿,修改收件人,再保存会产生新的threadId, 而之前保存的草稿theadId还存在,导致此问题。
(必现。 解决方法:将原来的Thread_id和新的收件人传递到Provider,对收件人进行更新,避免生成新的Thread)
MMS草稿保存
private void asyncUpdateDraftMmsMessage(final Conversation conv, final boolean isStopping) { if (Log.isLoggable(LogTag.APP, Log.VERBOSE)) { LogTag.debug("asyncUpdateDraftMmsMessage conv=%s mMessageUri=%s", conv, mMessageUri); } final HashMap<Uri, InputStream> preOpenedFiles = mSlideshow.openPartFiles(mContentResolver); new Thread(new Runnable() { @Override public void run() { try { DraftCache.getInstance().setSavingDraft(true); final PduPersister persister = PduPersister.getPduPersister(mActivity); final SendReq sendReq = makeSendReq(conv, mSubject); persister.setMmsDraftThreadId(mOldMmsDraftThreadId);//add by antoon, send old thread_id to pdu if (mMessageUri == null) { mMessageUri = createDraftMmsMessage(persister, sendReq, mSlideshow, null, mActivity, preOpenedFiles);//对于MMS保存,thread_id会在pdu保存时创建 } else { updateDraftMmsMessage(mMessageUri, persister, mSlideshow, sendReq, preOpenedFiles);//修改之前保存的MMS后,pdu更新数据,这里会根据收件人getOrCreateThreadId,所以修改收件人会导致创建新的thread } ensureThreadIdIfNeeded(conv, isStopping);//这里确认thread_id创建或获取成功,否则再次执行getOrCreateThreadId conv.setDraftState(true); if (Log.isLoggable(LogTag.APP, Log.VERBOSE)) { LogTag.debug("asyncUpdateDraftMmsMessage conv: " + conv + " uri: " + mMessageUri); } // Be paranoid and delete any SMS drafts that might be lying around. Must do // this after ensureThreadId so conv has the correct thread id. asyncDeleteDraftSmsMessage(conv); } finally { DraftCache.getInstance().setSavingDraft(false); closePreOpenedFiles(preOpenedFiles); } } }, "WorkingMessage.asyncUpdateDraftMmsMessage").start(); }
看看 ensureThreadIdIfNeeded(conv, isStopping)
private void ensureThreadIdIfNeeded(final Conversation conv, final boolean isStopping) { if (isStopping && conv.getMessageCount() == 0) { // We need to save the drafts in an unorphaned thread id. When the user goes // back to ConversationList while we're saving a draft from CMA's.onStop, // ConversationList will delete all threads from the thread table that // don't have associated sms or pdu entries. In case our thread got deleted, // well call clearThreadId() so ensureThreadId will query the db for the new // thread. conv.clearThreadId(); // force us to get the updated thread id } if (!conv.getRecipients().isEmpty()) { conv.ensureThreadId(); } }
public synchronized void clearThreadId() { // remove ourself from the cache if (Log.isLoggable(LogTag.APP, Log.VERBOSE)) { LogTag.debug("clearThreadId old threadId was: " + mThreadId + " now zero"); } Cache.remove(mThreadId); mThreadId = 0; } public synchronized long ensureThreadId() { if (DEBUG || DELETEDEBUG) { LogTag.debug("ensureThreadId before: " + mThreadId); } if (mThreadId <= 0) { if (mIsGroupChat && mGroupChat != null) { HashSet<String> numbers = new HashSet<String>(); numbers.add(String.valueOf(mGroupChat.getThreadId())); ContactList groupRecip = ContactList.getByNumbers(numbers, false); mThreadId = getOrCreateThreadId(mContext, groupRecip, mIsGroupChat); } else { mThreadId = getOrCreateThreadId(mContext, mRecipients, mIsGroupChat); } } if (DEBUG || DELETEDEBUG) { LogTag.debug("ensureThreadId after: " + mThreadId); } return mThreadId; }
对于MMS, SMS草稿保存时都会调用 ensureThreadIdIfNeeded , 如果修改了收件人,应该都会有thread_id重建,获取操作。
但是对于SMS却没有反馈此问题,是怎么回事呢?
——原因:sms草稿会在重新打开时,将数据库删掉。重新保存草稿时,重新插入数据。 而MMS草稿在重新打开时,不会将数据库删除,修改收件人后,重新创建thread,导致此Bug。
但sms草稿的处理方式,重新打开sms草稿,即使不修改,再次保存时,也会重新创建数据库数据。