zoukankan      html  css  js  c++  java
  • [LeetCode] Edit Distance

    This is a classic problem of Dynamic Programming. We define the state dp[i][j] to be the minimum number of operations to convert word1[0..i - 1] to word2[0..j - 1]. The state equations have two cases: the boundary case and the general case. Note that in the above notations, both i and j take values starting from 1.

    For the boundary case, that is, to convert a string to an empty string, it is easy to see that the mininum number of operations to convert word1[0..i - 1] to "" requires at least i operations (deletions). In fact, the boundary case is simply:

    1. dp[i][0] = i;
    2. dp[0][j] = j.

    Now let's move on to the general case, that is, convert a non-empty word1[0..i - 1] to another non-empty word2[0..j - 1]. Well, let's try to break this problem down into smaller problems (sub-problems). Suppose we have already known how to convert word1[0..i - 2] to word2[0..j - 2], which is dp[i - 1][j - 1]. Now let's consider word[i - 1] and word2[j - 1]. If they are euqal, then no more operation is needed and dp[i][j] = dp[i - 1][j - 1]. Well, what if they are not equal?

    If they are not equal, we need to consider three cases:

    1. Replace word1[i - 1] by word2[j - 1] (dp[i][j] = dp[i - 1][j - 1] + 1 (for replacement));
    2. Delete word1[i - 1] and word1[0..i - 2] = word2[0..j - 1] (dp[i][j] = dp[i - 1][j] + 1 (for deletion));
    3. Insert word2[j - 1] to word1[0..i - 1] and word1[0..i - 1] + word2[j - 1] = word2[0..j - 1] (dp[i][j] = dp[i][j - 1] + 1 (for insertion)).

    Make sure you understand the subtle differences between the equations for deletion and insertion. For deletion, we are actually converting word1[0..i - 2] to word2[0..j - 1], which costs dp[i - 1][j], and then deleting the word1[i - 1], which costs 1. The case is similar for insertion.

    Putting these together, we now have:

    1. dp[i][0] = i;
    2. dp[0][j] = j;
    3. dp[i][j] = dp[i - 1][j - 1], if word1[i - 1] = word2[j - 1];
    4. dp[i][j] = min(dp[i - 1][j - 1] + 1, dp[i - 1][j] + 1, dp[i][j - 1] + 1), otherwise.

    The above state equations can be turned into the following code directly.

     1 class Solution { 
     2 public:
     3     int minDistance(string word1, string word2) { 
     4         int m = word1.length(), n = word2.length();
     5         vector<vector<int> > dp(m + 1, vector<int> (n + 1, 0));
     6         for (int i = 1; i <= m; i++)
     7             dp[i][0] = i;
     8         for (int j = 1; j <= n; j++)
     9             dp[0][j] = j;  
    10         for (int i = 1; i <= m; i++) {
    11             for (int j = 1; j <= n; j++) {
    12                 if (word1[i - 1] == word2[j - 1]) 
    13                     dp[i][j] = dp[i - 1][j - 1];
    14                 else dp[i][j] = min(dp[i - 1][j - 1] + 1, min(dp[i][j - 1] + 1, dp[i - 1][j] + 1));
    15             }
    16         }
    17         return dp[m][n];
    18     }
    19 };

    Well, you may have noticed that each time when we update dp[i][j], we only need dp[i - 1][j - 1], dp[i][j - 1], dp[i - 1][j]. In fact, we need not maintain the full m*n matrix. Instead, maintaing one column is enough. The code can be optimized to O(m) or O(n) space, depending on whether you maintain a row or a column of the original matrix.

    The optimized code is as follows.

     1 class Solution { 
     2 public:
     3     int minDistance(string word1, string word2) {
     4         int m = word1.length(), n = word2.length();
     5         vector<int> cur(m + 1, 0);
     6         for (int i = 1; i <= m; i++)
     7             cur[i] = i;
     8         for (int j = 1; j <= n; j++) {
     9             int pre = cur[0];
    10             cur[0] = j;
    11             for (int i = 1; i <= m; i++) {
    12                 int temp = cur[i];
    13                 if (word1[i - 1] == word2[j - 1])
    14                     cur[i] = pre;
    15                 else cur[i] = min(pre + 1, min(cur[i] + 1, cur[i - 1] + 1));
    16                 pre = temp;
    17             }
    18         }
    19         return cur[m]; 
    20     }
    21 }; 

    Well, if you find the above code hard to understand, you may first try to write a two-column version that explicitly maintains two columns (the previous column and the current column) and then simplify the two-column version into the one-column version like the above code :-)

  • 相关阅读:
    LoadRunner对移动互联网后端服务器压力测试
    Android性能测试工具Emmagee
    Android APP测试流程
    手机APP测试点总结
    Jmeter与LoadRunner的异同
    理解JMeter聚合报告(Aggregate Report)
    树的深度优先遍历和广度优先遍历非递归实现.
    帮助大家理解一下递归函数的返回值...
    使用散列表来降低时间复杂度
    写代码一定要注意边界问题,要考虑全面开始的边界以及结束的边界,已防止出现严重的错误。
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/jcliBlogger/p/4617289.html
Copyright © 2011-2022 走看看