Many old buildings are protected by law because they are part of a nation's history. However, some people think they should be knocked down to make way for new ones because people need houses and offices. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress?
For countries with a long history there is always some conflict between the new and the old. In cities in particular, buildings are constantly torn down and replaced with higher ones so as to accomodate the ever increasing population. Unfortunately, many historic buildings become victims of these development projects.
Demolishing old buildings often leads to irreparable loss. Architecture from the past is often llinked with certain historic events, the description of which may sometimes be found in history books. But our understanding of such episodes would be greatly improved by visiting the tangible remmants from the past. Buildings are part of the legacy bestowed by our ancestors to whom we show our respect by preserving their constructions. Once torn down, those legacies are gone for ever.
Besides, most ancient buildings are of great artistic and aesthetic value. The sheer fact that they have stood the vicissitudes of centuries says something about its building technique. Indeed, the constuction method of the Pyramid and the Great Wall has baffled modern architects. Many of the art works inside those buildings fill people with wonder and attract tourists from around the globe. The grandeur of those buildings is still unsurpassed today.
Actually, the old and the new need not be in mortal conflict. They can co-exist in harmony. Of course, those buildings without historic or artistic value should be torn down. The rest may need some restoration to rule out safety problems. The world would be a duller place if there were only modern buildings, which more or less resemble one another.
Reference:
剑桥雅思写作高分范文
在京东购买：剑桥雅思写作高分范文
在亚马逊购买：剑桥雅思写作真题范文百篇