zoukankan      html  css  js  c++  java
  • JavaScript, We Hardly new Ya

    JavaScript is a prototypal language, but it has a new operator that tries to make it look sort of like a classical language. That tends to confuse programmers, leading to some problematic programming patterns.

    You never need to use new Object() in JavaScript. Use the object literal {} instead. Similarly, don’t use new Array(), use the array literal [] instead. Arrays in JavaScript work nothing like the arrays in Java, and use of the Java-like syntax will confuse you.

    Do not use new Number, new String, or new Boolean. These forms produce unnecessary object wrappers. Just use simple literals instead.

    Do not use new Function to create function values. Use function expressions instead.

    For example,

    frames[0].onfocus = new Function("document.bgColor='antiquewhite'")

    is better written as

    frames[0].onfocus = function () {document.bgColor = 'antiquewhite';};

    The second form allows the compiler to see the function body sooner, so any errors in it will be detected sooner. Sometimes new Function is used by people who do not understand how inner functions work.

    selObj.onchange = new Function("dynamicOptionListObjects["

    +dol.index+"].change(this)");

    If we keep function bodies in strings, the compiler can’t see them. If we keep function bodies as string expressions, we can’t see them either. It is better to not program in ignorance.

    By making a function that returns a function, we can explicitly pass in the values we want to bind. This allows us to initialize a set of selObj in a loop.

    selObj.onchange = function (i) {

    return function () {

    dynamicOptionListObjects[i].change(this);

    };

    }(dol.index);

    It is never a good idea to put new directly in front of function. For example, new function provides no advantage in constructing new objects.

    myObj = new function () {

    this.type = 'core';

    };

    It is better to use an object literal. It is smaller, faster.

    myObj = {

    type: 'core'

    };

    If we are making an object containing methods that are bound to private variables and functions, it is still better to leave off the new prefix.

    var foo = new function() {

    function processMessages(message) {

    alert("Message: " + message.content);

    }

    this.init = function() {

    subscribe("/mytopic", this, processMessages);

    }

    }

    By using new to invoke the function, the object holds onto a worthless prototype object. That wastes memory with no offsetting advantage. If we do not use the new, we don’t keep the wasted prototype object in the chain. So instead we will invoke the factory function the right way, using ().

    var foo = function () {

    function processMessages(message) {

    alert("Message: " + message.content);

    }

    return {

    init: function () {

    subscribe("/mytopic", this, processMessages);

    }

    };

    }();

    So the rule is simple: The only time we should use the new operator is to invoke a pseudoclassical Constructor function. When calling a Constructor function, the use of new is mandatory.

    There is a time to new, and a time to not.


  • 相关阅读:
    [亲测可用]springBoot调用对方webService接口的几种方法示例
    jdk8获取当前时间|时间加减|java8时间格式化|时间处理工具|时间比较|线程安全的时间处理方法
    python之for循环和while循环的使用教程,小白也能学会的python之路
    [亲测可用]hibernate调用Oracle存储过程|Spring Data JPA调用Oracle存储过程方法
    说说2020年,程序员最难的一年,裁员潮一份好的简历不能少
    几行样式代码,让你的网站全站和图片都变成灰色|CSS样式灰色代码
    python之input()函数的使用——在终端输入想要的值,小白也能学会的python之路
    python之列表的增删用法和python字典的用法,小白也能学会的python之路
    众志成城抗肺炎,程序猿也发挥大作用
    Java并发包中原子操作类原理
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/jinweijie/p/566619.html
Copyright © 2011-2022 走看看