案例环境:
操作系统版本 : Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard SP1
数据库版本 : Microsoft SQL Server 2012 (SP1) - 11.0.3000.0 (X64)
案例介绍:
由于不能将生产环境的代码和数据贴上来,所以我构造了下面一个小案例,当然没法和生产环境的案例一致。只能是接近而已。但是足以反映问题本质就足够了。
DROP TABLE ProductPrice;
GO CREATE TABLE ProductPrice
(
ProductName VARCHAR(14), Sequence INT ,
ProductPrice FLOAT )
GO
构造8000条测试数据,然后将数据插入临时表#tmp(其实完全可以不用临时表,只因为生产环境也是临时表,故模拟接近案例环境)
DECLARE @index INT =1;
DECLARE @subindex INT;
WHILE @index <= 800
BEGIN SET @subindex = 1; WHILE @subindex <=10 BEGIN INSERT INTO ProductPriceSELECT 'product' + convert(varchar,@index), @subindex, rand()*1000;
SET @subindex = @subindex +1; END;SET @index = @index +1;
ENDSELECT * INTO #tmp FROM ProductPrice;
GO
本来开发人人员也许是要使用动态SQL语句获取下面这样一段SQL语句(随意构造小例子,形似神不似)
DECLARE @sqlText NVARCHAR(MAX) ='';
SELECT @sqlText=@sqlText+ quotename(productname)+'=CAST(MAX(CASE WHEN [productname]='+QUOTENAME(productname,'''')
+' THEN [productPrice] END) AS VARCHAR)' FROM #tmp GROUP BY ProductName
SELECT datalength(@sqlText);
但是由于疏忽或是对动态SQL不了解,写成了这样一个SQL语句,结果执行时间一下子飚增到7分多钟。
DECLARE @sqlText NVARCHAR(MAX) ='';
SELECT @sqlText=@sqlText+ quotename(productname)+'=CAST(MAX(CASE WHEN [productname]='+QUOTENAME(productname,'''')
+' THEN [productPrice] END) AS VARCHAR)' FROM #tmp ; SELECT datalength(@sqlText);看来SQL对于处理非常长的字符串对象有一定的性能问题,于是为了验证我的想法,我又构造了下面一个例子。创建临时表#tmp,数据来源于 sys.all_columns
DROP TABLE #tmp;
GOSELECT * INTO #tmp FROM sys.all_columns;
GO7364 行受影响)
然后我们来看一下下面SQL语句
DECLARE @output NVARCHAR(MAX)
SELECT @output=ISNULL(@output,'') + QUOTENAME(name) + REPLICATE('it is only a test ', 200)
FROM #tmp那么我们来看看这条SQL的执行计划,如下所示,很普通的执行计划,看不出有啥特别之处。但是执行性能那叫一个糟糕透顶!
SET SHOWPLAN_ALL ON;
GODECLARE @output NVARCHAR(MAX)
SELECT @output=ISNULL(@output,'') + QUOTENAME(name) + REPLICATE('it is only a test ', 200)
FROM #tmp StmtText的内容,如下所示:
DECLARE @output NVARCHAR(MAX)
SELECT @output=ISNULL(@output,'') + QUOTENAME(name) + REPLICATE('it is only a test ', 200)
FROM #tmp
|--Compute Scalar(DEFINE:([Expr1004]=isnull([@output],CONVERT_IMPLICIT(nvarchar(max),'',0))+quotename([tempdb].[dbo].[#tmp].[name])+N'it is only a test it is only a test it is only a test it is only a test it is only a test it is only a test it is only a test it is only a test it is only a test it is only a test it is only a test it is only a test it is only a test it is onl'))
|--Table Scan(OBJECT:([tempdb].[dbo].[#tmp]))
虽然能理解处理大对象需要很多资源,会产生一定的性能问题,但是执行时间这么长,还是让我觉得有点不可思议,但是又不清楚具体原因!

![clipboard[1] clipboard[1]](https://images0.cnblogs.com/blog/73542/201407/251616102604854.png)
![clipboard[2] clipboard[2]](https://images0.cnblogs.com/blog/73542/201407/251616213221175.png)
![clipboard[3] clipboard[3]](https://images0.cnblogs.com/blog/73542/201407/251616279635014.png)