zoukankan      html  css  js  c++  java
  • What is the difference between the ways to implement inheritance in javascript.

    see also :

    http://www.w3school.com.cn/js/pro_js_inheritance_implementing.asp

    http://davidshariff.com/blog/javascript-inheritance-patterns/

    Object masquerading with Javascript

    Often people follow this common approach to make their Javascript programs object oriented. Let me explain one more approach for creating subclasses.

    Prototype Approach (Common)

    Base Class

    function Person(fname, lname){
    this.fname = fname;
    this.lname = lname;
    }

    Person.prototype.getFullName = function(){
    return this.fname+” “+this.lname;
    }

    SubClass

    function Employee(jobType){
    this.jobType = jobType;
    }

    Employee.prototype = new Person();

    Employee.prototype.getNameAndJobType = function(){
    return this.fname+” “+this.lname+” “+this.jobType;
    }
    Cons
    1. Every subclass of Person creates an instance of Person to assign to it’s prototype. Its an unnecessary overhead.
    2. constructor of Employee’s instance is returned as Person. Weird!
    3. Properties inherited from Person has to be assigned explicitly. You can’t create Employee instances like this. var employee = new Employee('Alice', 'Bob', 'Engineer');

        instead you have to assign fname and lname explicitly.  var employee = new Employee('Engineer');
    employee.fname = 'Alice';
    employee.lname = 'Bob';

    Pros
    1. employee instanceof Employee ===  employee instanceof Person === true

    Object Masquerading Approach

    Base Class

    function Person(fname, lname){
    this.fname = fname;
    this.lname = lname;
    }

    Person.prototype.getFullName = function(){
    return this.fname+” “+this.lname;
    }

    SubClass

    function Employee(fname, lname, jobType){
    this.jobType = jobType;
    Person.call(this, fname, lname);
    }

    Employee.prototype.getNameAndJobType = function(){
    return this.fname+” “+this.lname+” “+this.jobType;
    }

    Pros
    1. You don’t need to create Person instance for every subclass of Person
    2. constructor of Employee’s instance is returned as Employee. Bingo!
    3. You can directly make Employee instance by [var employee = new Employee('Alice', 'Bob', 'Engineer')]

    Cons
    1.  employee instanceof Employee === true BUT employee instanceof Person === false
    2. In this approach an employee instance doesn’t has access to Person’s method if the method is defined in prototype instead of inside constructor definition.    var employee = new Employee('Alice', 'Bob', 'Engineer');
    employee.getFullName(); //Doesn't work

    After subclassing Person, you need to copy all the methods from Person’s prototype to Employee’s prototype.    function copyPrototype(from, to){
    var fromPrototype = from.prototype;
    var toPrototype = to.prototype;
    for(o in fromPrototype){
    if(fromPrototype.hasOwnProperty(o)){
    toPrototype[o] = fromPrototype[o];
    }
    }
    }

        copyPrototype(Person, Employee);

    Note: Employee instance would have access to Person’s method if it was defined inside function instead or prototype. But still, you should always define methods in prototype instead of constructor. Defining methods inside Constructor makes instances heavy.

  • 相关阅读:
    POJ 1320 Street Numbers(佩尔方程)
    hdu 3292 No more tricks, Mr Nanguo
    佩尔方程
    hdu 4825 xor sum(字典树+位运算)
    Xor Sum 2(位运算)
    数串
    EJS
    JQuery性能优化
    常用正则
    JavaScript prototype继承中的问题
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/malaikuangren/p/3791082.html
Copyright © 2011-2022 走看看