zoukankan      html  css  js  c++  java
  • protected: C++ access control works on per-class basis, not on per-object basis

    一个很简单的问题:

    //为什么BASE::foo()中可以直接通过p访问val? 看本记录标题,这个问题困扰了很长一段时间,终于解决
    class
    BASE {
          private:
               int val;
    public:void foo(BASE *p) { int w = p->val; } };

    同学参加一场笔试,抛出个问题,丫凡和我讨论了下,丫凡在stackoverflow上找到了答案……

    如下内容引述自:http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6986798/subtle-c-inheritance-error-with-protected-fields                        

    ==========================================================================

    Below is a subtle example of accessing an instance's protected field x. B is a subclass of A so any variable of type B is also of type A. Why can B::foo() access b's x field, but not a's x field?

    class A 
    {
        protected:
              int x;
    };
    
    class B : public A 
    {
        protected:
          A *a;
          B *b;
        public:
          void foo() 
          {
              int u = x;     // OK : accessing inherited protected field x
              int v = b->x;  // OK : accessing b's protected field x
              int w = a->x;  // ERROR : accessing a's protected field x
          }
    };

    Why can the B::foo() access the members of the contained class B pointer b?

    The rule is:
    In C++ access control works on per-class basis, not on per-object basis.
    So an instance of class B will always have access to all the members of another instance of class B.

    class A 
    {
        protected:
            int x;
    };
    
    class B : public A 
    {
        public:
            void foo() 
            {
                int u = x;     // OK : accessing inherited protected field
            }
    };

    Since child is inheriting parent, child gets x. Hence you can access x directly in foo() method of child. This is the concept of protected variables. You can access protected variables of parent in child directly. Note : Here I am saying you can access x directly but not through A's object! Whats the difference ? Since, x is protected, you cannot access A's protected objects outside A. Doesnt matter where it is - If its main or Child . That's why you are not able to access in the following way.

    Here comes an interesting concept. You can access a private variable of a class using its object with in the class!

    class dummy 
    {
        private : 
          int x;
        public:
          void foo() 
          {
              dummy *d;
              int y = d->x; // Even though x is private, still you can access x from object of d - But only with in this class. You cannot do the same outside the class. 
          }
    }; 
  • 相关阅读:
    [PKUWC2018][LOJ2537]Minimax(线段树合并)
    [NOI2019][洛谷P5471]弹跳(dijkstra+KD-Tree)
    [BZOJ4770]图样(概率期望、二进制数位dp)
    [SPOJ11482][BZOJ2787]Count on a trie(广义SA+长链剖分+BIT)
    [HEOI/TJOI2016][洛谷P4094]字符串(SA+主席树)
    [BZOJ3270]博物馆(矩阵求逆)
    [NOI2016][洛谷P1117]优秀的拆分(SA)
    [NOI2018][洛谷P4770]你的名字(SAM+SA+主席树)
    设置echarts两个y轴的0点一致
    echarts中饼图或环形图的高亮效果(点击高亮/默认某一条高亮)
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/openix/p/3346275.html
Copyright © 2011-2022 走看看