MySQL主从1205报错【转】

主从报错1205 Slave SQL thread retried transaction 10 time(s) in vain, giving up. Consider raising the value of the slave_transaction_retries variable

Last_Errno: 1205
Last_Error: Slave SQL thread retried transaction 10 time(s) in vain, giving up. Consider raising the value of the slave_transaction_retries variable 

 解决办法：

stop slave;
start slave;
show slave statusG;

大家都知道DBA就像是消（背）防（锅）员（侠），因为前端应用还有开发上线的新版本都会影响到位于最底层的数据库，前方稍微有些风吹草动，就能反应在数据库的性能上。但是有的时候SQL不仅能决定数据库的性能，还能决定数据库的生死，今天的案例是开发的一条SQL，引起的MySQL数据库主从复制报错，vip漂移问题。

今天下午有客户反馈发消息有点慢，手机收到几条报警：

nagios报警如下大致意思就是

14:39分   vip发生了漂移

**** Nagios ***** 

Notification Type: PROBLEM 
Service: check_ha_mysqld 
Host: prod-bjuc-mysql1-vip 
Address: 192.168.87.74 
State: CRITICAL 
Date/Time: Wed Mar 28 14:39:27 CST 2018 
Additional Info: 
CRITICAL: HA Failover from 192.168.87.72 to 192.168.87.123,         
192.168.87.123 result:PROCS OK: 1 processes with command name /usr/sbin/mysqld, 
args  VIP=192.168.87.74, 192.168.87.72:PROCS OK: 1 processes with command name /usr/sbin/mysqld

14:46分主从复制中断

***** Nagios ***** 

Notification Type: PROBLEM 
Service: check_mysql_health_slave-sql-running 
Host: bjuc-mysql1 
Address: 192.168.87.72 
State: CRITICAL 
Date/Time: Wed Mar 28 14:46:06 CST 2018 
Additional Info: 
CRITICAL - Slave sql is not running

登录数据库服务器查看主从复制的状态，发现报错1205错

mysql> show slave statusG
*************************** 1. row ***************************
               Slave_IO_State: Waiting for master to send event
                  Master_Host: 192.168.87.123
                  Master_User: zhu
                  Master_Port: 3306
                Connect_Retry: 60
              Master_Log_File: mysql-bin.000481
          Read_Master_Log_Pos: 218802975
               Relay_Log_File: mysql-relay-bin.000428
                Relay_Log_Pos: 2428110
        Relay_Master_Log_File: mysql-bin.000481
             Slave_IO_Running: Yes
            Slave_SQL_Running: No
              Replicate_Do_DB: 
          Replicate_Ignore_DB: performance_schema,information_schema,test,mysql
           Replicate_Do_Table: 
       Replicate_Ignore_Table: 
      Replicate_Wild_Do_Table: %.%
  Replicate_Wild_Ignore_Table: 
                   Last_Errno: 1205
                   Last_Error: Error 'Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction' on query. Default database: 'statusnet'. Query: 'UPDATE notice_status_new set valid = 0 WHERE conversation = 384667 AND user_id IN(4337475,4337529,4337471,4337365)'
                 Skip_Counter: 0
          Exec_Master_Log_Pos: 182088298
              Relay_Log_Space: 39142986
              Until_Condition: None
               Until_Log_File: 
                Until_Log_Pos: 0
           Master_SSL_Allowed: No
           Master_SSL_CA_File: 
           Master_SSL_CA_Path: 
              Master_SSL_Cert: 
            Master_SSL_Cipher: 
               Master_SSL_Key: 
        Seconds_Behind_Master: NULL
Master_SSL_Verify_Server_Cert: No
                Last_IO_Errno: 0
                Last_IO_Error: 
Last_SQL_Errno: 1205
Last_SQL_Error: Error 'Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction' on query. 
Default database: 'statusnet'. Query: 'UPDATE notice_status_new set valid = 0 WHERE conversation = 384667 AND user_id IN(4337475,4337529,4337471,4337365)'
  Replicate_Ignore_Server_Ids: 
             Master_Server_Id: 6
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

查看错误日志有一下报错信息：

错误日志中给出了报错原因和解决方法

tail -70 error.log

180328 14:36:05 [ERROR] Slave SQL: Error 'Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction' on query. Default database: 'statusnet'. Query: 'UPDATE notice_status_new set valid = 0 WHERE conversation = 384667 AND user_id IN(4337475,4337529,4337471,4337365)', Error_code: 1205
180328 14:36:21 [ERROR] Slave SQL: Error 'Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction' on query. Default database: 'statusnet'. Query: 'UPDATE notice_status_new set valid = 0 WHERE conversation = 384667 AND user_id IN(4337475,4337529,4337471,4337365)', Error_code: 1205
180328 14:36:38 [ERROR] Slave SQL: Error 'Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction' on query. Default database: 'statusnet'. Query: 'UPDATE notice_status_new set valid = 0 WHERE conversation = 384667 AND user_id IN(4337475,4337529,4337471,4337365)', Error_code: 1205
180328 14:36:56 [ERROR] Slave SQL: Error 'Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction' on query. Default database: 'statusnet'. Query: 'UPDATE notice_status_new set valid = 0 WHERE conversation = 384667 AND user_id IN(4337475,4337529,4337471,4337365)', Error_code: 1205
180328 14:37:15 [ERROR] Slave SQL: Error 'Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction' on query. Default database: 'statusnet'. Query: 'UPDATE notice_status_new set valid = 0 WHERE conversation = 384667 AND user_id IN(4337475,4337529,4337471,4337365)', Error_code: 1205
180328 14:37:35 [ERROR] Slave SQL: Error 'Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction' on query. Default database: 'statusnet'. Query: 'UPDATE notice_status_new set valid = 0 WHERE conversation = 384667 AND user_id IN(4337475,4337529,4337471,4337365)', Error_code: 1205
180328 14:37:56 [ERROR] Slave SQL: Error 'Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction' on query. Default database: 'statusnet'. Query: 'UPDATE notice_status_new set valid = 0 WHERE conversation = 384667 AND user_id IN(4337475,4337529,4337471,4337365)', Error_code: 1205
180328 14:38:17 [ERROR] Slave SQL: Error 'Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction' on query. Default database: 'statusnet'. Query: 'UPDATE notice_status_new set valid = 0 WHERE conversation = 384667 AND user_id IN(4337475,4337529,4337471,4337365)', Error_code: 1205
180328 14:38:38 [ERROR] Slave SQL: Error 'Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction' on query. Default database: 'statusnet'. Query: 'UPDATE notice_status_new set valid = 0 WHERE conversation = 384667 AND user_id IN(4337475,4337529,4337471,4337365)', Error_code: 1205
180328 14:38:59 [ERROR] Slave SQL: Error 'Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction' on query. Default database: 'statusnet'. Query: 'UPDATE notice_status_new set valid = 0 WHERE conversation = 384667 AND user_id IN(4337475,4337529,4337471,4337365)', Error_code: 1205
180328 14:39:20 [ERROR] Slave SQL: Error 'Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction' on query. Default database: 'statusnet'. Query: 'UPDATE notice_status_new set valid = 0 WHERE conversation = 384667 AND user_id IN(4337475,4337529,4337471,4337365)', Error_code: 1205
180328 14:39:20 [ERROR] Slave SQL thread retried transaction 10 time(s) in vain, giving up. Consider raising the value of the slave_transaction_retries variable.
180328 14:39:20 [Warning] Slave: Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction Error_code: 1205
180328 14:39:20 [ERROR] Error running query, slave SQL thread aborted. Fix the problem, and restart the slave SQL thread with "SLAVE START". We stopped at log 'mysql-bin.000481' position 182088298

查看参数结合着两个参数可以知道主从复制报错的原因为：

180328 14:39:20 [ERROR] Slave SQL thread retried transaction 10 time(s) in vain, giving up. Consider raising the value of the slave_transaction_retries variable.

180328 14:39:20 [Warning] Slave: Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction Error_code: 1205

180328 14:39:20 [ERROR] Error running query, slave SQL thread aborted，Fix the problem, and restart the slave SQL thread with "SLAVE START". We stopped at log 'mysql-bin.000481' position 182088298

因为表notice_status_new产生了锁，阻塞了这条update语句

参数innodb_lock_wait_time 设置的为15秒，单个事务在等待15秒后开始报1025错：因为锁执行超时并重启事务

参数slave_transaction_retries 设置的为10次，如果事务重试次数超过10次，复制中断。（但是错误日志中尝试了11次）

mysql> show variables like '%innodb_lock_wait_timeout%';

+--------------------------+-------+
| Variable_name            | Value |
+--------------------------+-------+
| innodb_lock_wait_timeout | 15    |
+--------------------------+-------+
1 row in set (0.01 sec)

mysql> show variables like '%slave_transaction_retries%';
+---------------------------+-------+
| Variable_name             | Value |
+---------------------------+-------+
| slave_transaction_retries | 10    |
+---------------------------+-------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

解决方法：重启slave后主从复制恢复，并开始追日志

mysql> stop slave;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.02 sec)

mysql> start slave;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)

mysql> show slave statusG
*************************** 1. row ***************************
           
             Slave_IO_Running: Yes
            Slave_SQL_Running: Yes
      
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

vip的问题等到晚上在切回来，

---------------------------------我是分割线--------------------------

这次问题虽然解决了，但是发现问题我们一定要找到根音，这样问题才能算是闭环。

为什么会产生这个锁呢，因为记录锁信息的表都是实时的，现在查不出当时的锁信息，但是从存储引擎的运行状态中还是能发现一些问题，数据库出现了死锁！！显然在update这张表一定会等待的！！

发现了一条奇葩SQL，被锁的那张表也是notice_status_new

UPDATE notice_status_new SET count = count + 1, push_count = push_count + 1 WHERE conversation = 2609759 AND user_id != 7384662 AND user_id IN(7359498)

show engine innodb statusG 
截取死锁的这部分
------------------------
LATEST DETECTED DEADLOCK
------------------------
180328 14:33:52
*** (1) TRANSACTION:
TRANSACTION 1B285E9F9, ACTIVE 0 sec starting index read
mysql tables in use 1, locked 1
LOCK WAIT 4 lock struct(s), heap size 1248, 3 row lock(s), undo log entries 1
MySQL thread id 3972036, OS thread handle 0x7fc0c3464700, query id 2525495433 192.168.87.42 dstatusnet Updating
UPDATE notice_status_new SET count = count + 1, push_count = push_count + 1 WHERE conversation = 2609759 AND user_id != 7384662 AND user_id IN(7359498)
*** (1) WAITING FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:
RECORD LOCKS space id 3535 page no 65360 n bits 448 index `conv_user` of table `statusnet`.`notice_status_new` trx id 1B285E9F9 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap waiting
Record lock, heap no 241 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 3; compact format; info bits 0
 0: len 8; hex 000000000027d25f; asc      ' _;;
 1: len 4; hex 80704c0a; asc  pL ;;
 2: len 4; hex 80b1a0fe; asc     ;;

*** (2) TRANSACTION:
TRANSACTION 1B285E9FD, ACTIVE 0 sec starting index read, thread declared inside InnoDB 500
mysql tables in use 1, locked 1
4 lock struct(s), heap size 1248, 3 row lock(s), undo log entries 1
MySQL thread id 3867908, OS thread handle 0x7fbfc6d4f700, query id 2525495437 192.168.87.42 dstatusnet Updating
UPDATE notice_status_new SET count = count + 1, push_count = push_count + 1 WHERE conversation = 2609759 AND user_id != 7359498 AND user_id IN(7384662)
*** (2) HOLDS THE LOCK(S):
RECORD LOCKS space id 3535 page no 65360 n bits 448 index `conv_user` of table `statusnet`.`notice_status_new` trx id 1B285E9FD lock_mode X locks rec but not gap
Record lock, heap no 241 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 3; compact format; info bits 0
 0: len 8; hex 000000000027d25f; asc      ' _;;
 1: len 4; hex 80704c0a; asc  pL ;;
 2: len 4; hex 80b1a0fe; asc     ;;

*** (2) WAITING FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:
RECORD LOCKS space id 3535 page no 65360 n bits 448 index `conv_user` of table `statusnet`.`notice_status_new` trx id 1B285E9FD lock_mode X locks rec but not gap waiting
Record lock, heap no 242 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 3; compact format; info bits 0
 0: len 8; hex 000000000027d25f; asc      ' _;;
 1: len 4; hex 8070ae56; asc  p V;;
 2: len 4; hex 80b1a0fc; asc     ;;

*** WE ROLL BACK TRANSACTION (2)

问题找到了，找对该业务的开发，沟通后决定在周六上线新版本，彻底解决问题。

可以写一个实时监控锁的脚本，把内容输出打印，这样方便以后定位问题！

-----------------------------------------------

后面想了想可能是由于vip漂移导致的主从复制报错

线上架构为MM+heartbeat

vip漂移的原因待定，vip漂移后，数据库开始在192.168.87.123服务器上写入数据库，72数据库作为备份库，但是还会同步123数据库的数据，由于192.168.87.72数据库表notice_status_new还存在死锁，所以在slave SQL thread应用来自123服务器的中继日志时，执行到该SQL时，发生了锁等待，等待15秒后超时并重新尝试该事务，尝试10后，还是在锁表状态，slave SQL thread 线程停止工作，主从同步中断。

----------------------------------------

3月29日和开发复盘

因为报警时间不是很准确，实际时间还是以heartbeat日志和mysql日志为准，通过查看日志确定是heartbeat首先发生漂移，然后才是主从复制报错

 

主要是讨论的问题有两个

①  Heartbeat为什么会发生漂移

通过查看heartbeat日志，72和123存在心跳检测，在72ping123的时候发生了丢包，

在123ping72的时候正常，72节点以为自己死掉？在14:35:26发生vip漂移，从72漂移到123。

Mar 28 14:35:26 bjuc-mysql1 pengine: [14176]: notice: LogActions: Move    VIP_192_168_87_74  (Started bjuc-mysql1 -> prod-uc-yewu-db-slave2)

②  为什么会出现死锁

从存储引擎的运行状态中查看，如果这两条SQL的请求同时到达数据库，因为innodb支持到行锁的粒度，第二条SQL会锁住很多行，如果和第一条SQL中锁住有重复的，就会发生相互等待的状况，所以出现死锁。

这两条SQL的where条件如下：

user_id IN(6032694,5824664,4344233,5450840,6032678,4951596,6032668,4344453,6038786,4344347,6032676,5754768);  
user_id != 6185996 
这两个条件可能发生逻辑上的冲突，然后导致死锁

转自

MySQL主从复制报错 Errno 1205-11774929-51CTO博客 http://blog.51cto.com/11784929/2092097