zoukankan      html  css  js  c++  java
  • Difference between 2>&-, 2>/dev/null, |&, &>/dev/null and >/dev/null 2>&1

    Reference link: http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/70963/difference-between-2-2-dev-null-dev-null-and-dev-null-21

     

    Just looking for the difference between

    • 2>&-
    • 2>/dev/null
    • |&
    • &>/dev/null
    • >/dev/null 2>&1

    and their portability with non-Bourne shells like tcshmksh, etc.

    shareimprove this question
     
        
    Note that, while mksh supports &> for GNU bash compatibility, it’s strongly encouraged to not use this, as parsing it can break the semantics of existing POSIX scripts, and mksh disables that in POSIX mode already. –  mirabilos Feb 27 at 13:56
    add comment

    2 Answers

    For background:

    • number 1 = standard out (i.e. STDOUT)
    • number 2 = standard error (i.e. STDERR)
    • if a number isn't explicitly given, then number 1 is assumed by the shell (bash)

    First let's tackle the function of these. For reference see the Advanced Bash-Scripting Guide.

    Functions

    2>&-

    The general form of this one is M>&-, where "M" is a file descriptor number. This will close output for whichever file descriptor is referenced, i.e. "M".

    2>/dev/null

    The general form of this one is M>/dev/null, where "M" is a file descriptor number. This will redirect the file descriptor, "M", to /dev/null.

    2>&1

    The general form of this one is M>&N, where "M" & "N" are file descriptor numbers. It combines the output of file descriptors "M" and "N" into a single stream.

    |&

    This is just an abbreviation for 2>&1. It was added in Bash 4.

    &>/dev/null

    This is just an abbreviation for 2>&1 >/dev/null. It too was added in Bash 4. It redirects file descriptor 2 (STDERR) and descriptor 1 (STDOUT) to /dev/null.

    >/dev/null

    This is just an abbreviation for 1>/dev/null. It redirects file descriptor 1 (STDOUT) to /dev/null.

    Portability to non-bash, tcsh, mksh, etc.

    I've not dealt much with other shells outside of csh and tcsh. My experience with those 2 compared to bash's redirection operators, is that bash is superior in that regard. See the tcsh man page for more details.

    Of the commands you asked about none are directly supported by csh/tcsh. You'd have to use different syntaxes to construct similar functions.

  • 相关阅读:
    css优化总结
    几种常用的图片格式
    css布局总结
    第四章复习题
    4.9,4.10
    4.8
    4.7指针
    libffi
    代理模式
    Redis 汇总
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/rosepotato/p/3709315.html
Copyright © 2011-2022 走看看