zoukankan      html  css  js  c++  java
  • NHibernate 3.2: mapping by code conventions

    After see some characteristic of one of the new NHibernate 3.2 feature it’s the time to see if the mapping by-code gives support to a convention based mapping. In NHibernate there isn’t a real difference between declarative-mapping and convention-based-mapping because every thing live together since the first commit.

    What you will see in this post is defined, by some people, as “auto-mapping”. We don’t have such pretention, and we don’t need to sell something so we are far away to call it auto-mapping but you are free to call it as you want.

    For the coming soon version we took the decision to avoid to override the tables/columns naming-convention provided by NHibernate XML mapping; the same for cascade.

    The domain model

    The model was provided by a NHibernate user: Luka (cluka23)

    NHConventions

    Well… not so complicated but even not so simple Winking smile

    The mapping

    Luka have sent me the conformist-mapping so I can understand which is his target. Only to have a little bit of fun I have added two fields for two collections (see class Application). The whole mapping with conventions and registration in NHibernate’s configuration is:

    1.     var mapper = new ConventionModelMapper();
    2.  
    3.     var baseEntityType = typeof(Entity);
    4.     mapper.IsEntity((t, declared) => baseEntityType.IsAssignableFrom(t) && baseEntityType != t && !t.IsInterface);
    5.     mapper.IsRootEntity((t, declared) => baseEntityType.Equals(t.BaseType));
    6.  
    7.     mapper.BeforeMapManyToOne += (insp, prop, map) => map.Column(prop.LocalMember.GetPropertyOrFieldType().Name + "Id");
    8.     mapper.BeforeMapManyToOne += (insp, prop, map) => map.Cascade(Cascade.Persist);
    9.     mapper.BeforeMapBag += (insp, prop, map) => map.Key(km => km.Column(prop.GetContainerEntity(insp).Name + "Id"));
    10.     mapper.BeforeMapBag += (insp, prop, map) => map.Cascade(Cascade.All);
    11.  
    12.     mapper.Class<Entity>(map =>
    13.     {
    14.         map.Id(x => x.Id, m => m.Generator(Generators.GuidComb));
    15.         map.Version(x => x.Version, m => m.Generated(VersionGeneration.Always));
    16.     });
    17.  
    18.     mapper.Class<Person>(map => map.Property(x => x.Name, pm => pm.Column("PersonName")));
    19.     mapper.Class<Tenant>(map => map.Bag(x => x.AppTenants, cm => cm.Inverse(true), r => { }));
    20.     mapper.Class<Customer>(map => map.Bag(x => x.Tenants, cm => cm.Inverse(true), r => { }));
    21.     mapper.Class<Application>(map =>
    22.     {
    23.         map.Bag(x => x.AppFeatures, cm => cm.Inverse(true), r => { });
    24.         map.Bag(x => x.AppTenants, cm => cm.Inverse(true), r => { });
    25.         map.Bag(x => x.Users, cm => cm.Inverse(true), r => { });
    26.     });
    27.  
    28.     var mapping = mapper.CompileMappingFor(baseEntityType.Assembly.GetExportedTypes().Where(t => t.Namespace.EndsWith("Model")));
    29.  
    30.     nhConf.AddDeserializedMapping(mapping,"LukaModel");

    Line 4: predicate to recognize entities.

    Line 5: predicate to recognize root entities.

    From line 7 to 10: some conventions.

    From line 12 to 16: some specific mapping of some properties strongly mapped using the base Entity class

    From line 18 to 26: some specific mapping of some properties for others entities

    Line 28: the creation of the mapping for the whole domain

    Line 30: registration of the mapping in the NHibernate configuration.

    As you can see there isn’t something special to override conventions, it is all the same you can use with explicit mapping.

    If you can’t resist to have a specific class to override a convention you can use something like this:

    public class ApplicationMapOverrideClassMapping<Application>
    {
        public ApplicationMapOverride()
        {
            Bag(x => x.AppFeatures, cm => cm.Inverse(true), r => { });
            Bag(x => x.AppTenants, cm => cm.Inverse(true), r => { });
            Bag(x => x.Users, cm => cm.Inverse(true), r => { });
        }
    }

    “Ehy!! Fabio, you are wrong!! that class is for conformist-mapping.” No, I’m not wrong. You can use the same identical classes to override your conventions, the same classes you can use for declarative mapping. Not only this but can even mix altogether:

    mapper.Class<Person>(map => map.Property(x => x.Name, pm => pm.Column("PersonName")));
    mapper.Class<Tenant>(map => map.Bag(x => x.AppTenants, cm => cm.Inverse(true), r => { }));
    mapper.Class<Customer>(map => map.Bag(x => x.Tenants, cm => cm.Inverse(true), r => { }));
    mapper.AddMapping<ApplicationMapOverride>();

    “and the two fields ?” those two fields was mapped, don’t worry. If you want see a chuck of the XML:

    <bag name="AppFeatures" access="nosetter.camelcase" inverse="true" cascade="all">
      <key column="ApplicationId" />
      <one-to-many class="AppFeature" />
    </bag>
    <bag name="AppTenants" access="nosetter.camelcase-underscore" inverse="true" cascade="all">
      <key column="ApplicationId" />
      <one-to-many class="AppTenant" />
    </bag>

     NHibernate 3.2 too sexy by far!!!

  • 相关阅读:
    续上-选课系统
    第一个java web的课堂练习-开始
    子类与父类方法间的关系
    课后作业-3
    小结
    Java中子类与基类变量间的赋值
    今日总结
    今日总结
    今日总结
    今日总结
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/sunjie9606/p/2169730.html
Copyright © 2011-2022 走看看