-
public class IdGenerator {
-
-
private final static long beginTs = 1483200000000L;
-
-
private long lastTs = 0L;
-
-
private long processId;
-
private int processIdBits = 10;
-
-
private long sequence = 0L;
-
private int sequenceBits = 12;
-
-
public IdGenerator() {
-
}
-
-
public IdGenerator(long processId) {
-
if (processId > ((1 << processIdBits) - 1)) {
-
throw new RuntimeException("进程ID超出范围,设置位数" + processIdBits + ",最大" + ((1 << processIdBits) - 1));
-
}
-
this.processId = processId;
-
}
-
-
protected long timeGen() {
-
return System.currentTimeMillis();
-
}
-
-
public synchronized long nextId() {
-
long ts = timeGen();
-
// 刚刚生成的时间戳比上次的时间戳还小,出错
-
if (ts < lastTs) {
-
throw new RuntimeException("时间戳顺序错误");
-
}
-
// 刚刚生成的时间戳跟上次的时间戳一样,则需要生成一个sequence序列号
-
if (ts == lastTs) {
-
// sequence循环自增
-
sequence = (sequence + 1) & ((1 << sequenceBits) - 1);
-
// 如果sequence=0则需要重新生成时间戳
-
if (sequence == 0) {
-
// 且必须保证时间戳序列往后
-
ts = nextTs(lastTs);
-
}
-
// 如果ts>lastTs,时间戳序列已经不同了,此时可以不必生成sequence了,直接取0
-
} else {
-
sequence = 0L;
-
}
-
// 更新lastTs时间戳
-
lastTs = ts;
-
return ((ts - beginTs) << (processIdBits + sequenceBits)) | (processId << sequenceBits) | sequence;
-
}
-
-
public Long nextShortId() {
-
Long shortId = System.currentTimeMillis() / 100 % 1000000000;
-
if (shortId < 100000000) {
-
shortId += 100000000;
-
}
-
return shortId;
-
}
-
-
protected long nextTs(long lastTs) {
-
long ts = timeGen();
-
while (ts <= lastTs) {
-
ts = timeGen();
-
}
-
return ts;
-
}
-
-
}
试一下这个算法的效率:
-
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
-
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
-
IdGenerator ig = new IdGenerator(1023);
-
Long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
-
Set<Long> set = new HashSet<Long>();
-
for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {
-
set.add(ig.nextId());
-
}
-
System.out.println(set.size());
-
System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis() - start);
-
}
结果:
set.size(): 100000
time:115