zoukankan      html  css  js  c++  java
  • 转AskTom:Oracle中关于in跟Exist谁效率高的问题。

    You Asked
    Tom:
    can you give me some example at which situation
    IN is better than exist, and vice versa. 
    and we said...
    Well, the two are processed very very differently.
    Select * from T1 where x in ( select y from T2 )
    is typically processed as:
    select * 
      from t1, ( select distinct y from t2 ) t2
    where t1.x = t2.y;
    The subquery is evaluated, distinct'ed, indexed (or hashed or sorted) and then joined to 
    the original table -- typically.
    As opposed to 
    select * from t1 where exists ( select null from t2 where y = x )
    That is processed more like:
      for x in ( select * from t1 )
      loop
      if ( exists ( select null from t2 where y = x.x )
      then 
      OUTPUT THE RECORD
      end if
      end loop
    It always results in a full scan of T1 whereas the first query can make use of an index 
    on T1(x).
    So, when is where exists appropriate and in appropriate?
    Lets say the result of the subquery
      ( select y from T2 )
    is "huge" and takes a long time. But the table T1 is relatively small and executing ( 
    select null from t2 where y = x.x ) is very very fast (nice index on t2(y)). Then the 
    exists will be faster as the time to full scan T1 and do the index probe into T2 could be 
    less then the time to simply full scan T2 to build the subquery we need to distinct on.
    Lets say the result of the subquery is small -- then IN is typicaly more appropriate.
    If both the subquery and the outer table are huge -- either might work as well as the 
    other -- depends on the indexes and other factors.

  • 相关阅读:
    设计模式 --单例模式
    Neor Profile SQL 中文汉化
    office online server 安装部署整合到到C#项目
    C# 线程池
    WinForm版 屏幕截图
    golang-nsq高性能消息队列
    【Go Time】Go语言里的条件语句else、switch
    【Go Time】Go语言常量定义关键字const
    【Go Time】Go定义变量
    【Go Time】Go语言里的空接口
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/tracy/p/1940229.html
Copyright © 2011-2022 走看看