zoukankan      html  css  js  c++  java
  • [tip:,x86/urgent] x86: Fix early boot crash on gcc-10, third try

    [tip:,x86/urgent] x86: Fix early boot crash on gcc-10, third try

     

     https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1242401/

     

     

    Message ID 158954160454.17951.15828011095215471629.tip-bot2@tip-bot2
    State Accepted
    Commit a9a3ed1eff3601b63aea4fb462d8b3b92c7c1e7e
    Headers show
    Series
    • [tip:,x86/urgent] x86: Fix early boot crash on gcc-10, third try
    Related show
     

    Commit Message

    tip-bot2 for Dan Williams May 15, 2020, 11:20 a.m. UTC
    The following commit has been merged into the x86/urgent branch of tip:
    
    Commit-ID:     a9a3ed1eff3601b63aea4fb462d8b3b92c7c1e7e
    Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/a9a3ed1eff3601b63aea4fb462d8b3b92c7c1e7e
    Author:        Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
    AuthorDate:    Wed, 22 Apr 2020 18:11:30 +02:00
    Committer:     Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
    CommitterDate: Fri, 15 May 2020 11:48:01 +02:00
    
    x86: Fix early boot crash on gcc-10, third try
    
    ... or the odyssey of trying to disable the stack protector for the
    function which generates the stack canary value.
    
    The whole story started with Sergei reporting a boot crash with a kernel
    built with gcc-10:
    
      Kernel panic — not syncing: stack-protector: Kernel stack is corrupted in: start_secondary
      CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 5.6.0-rc5—00235—gfffb08b37df9 #139
      Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. To be filled by O.E.M./H77M—D3H, BIOS F12 11/14/2013
      Call Trace:
        dump_stack
        panic
        ? start_secondary
        __stack_chk_fail
        start_secondary
        secondary_startup_64
      -—-[ end Kernel panic — not syncing: stack—protector: Kernel stack is corrupted in: start_secondary
    
    This happens because gcc-10 tail-call optimizes the last function call
    in start_secondary() - cpu_startup_entry() - and thus emits a stack
    canary check which fails because the canary value changes after the
    boot_init_stack_canary() call.
    
    To fix that, the initial attempt was to mark the one function which
    generates the stack canary with:
    
      __attribute__((optimize("-fno-stack-protector"))) ... start_secondary(void *unused)
    
    however, using the optimize attribute doesn't work cumulatively
    as the attribute does not add to but rather replaces previously
    supplied optimization options - roughly all -fxxx options.
    
    The key one among them being -fno-omit-frame-pointer and thus leading to
    not present frame pointer - frame pointer which the kernel needs.
    
    The next attempt to prevent compilers from tail-call optimizing
    the last function call cpu_startup_entry(), shy of carving out
    start_secondary() into a separate compilation unit and building it with
    -fno-stack-protector, was to add an empty asm("").
    
    This current solution was short and sweet, and reportedly, is supported
    by both compilers but we didn't get very far this time: future (LTO?)
    optimization passes could potentially eliminate this, which leads us
    to the third attempt: having an actual memory barrier there which the
    compiler cannot ignore or move around etc.
    
    That should hold for a long time, but hey we said that about the other
    two solutions too so...
    
    Reported-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>
    Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
    Tested-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
    Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
    Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200314164451.346497-1-slyfox@gentoo.org
    ---
     arch/x86/include/asm/stackprotector.h | 7 ++++++-
     arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c             | 8 ++++++++
     arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c                 | 1 +
     include/linux/compiler.h              | 6 ++++++
     init/main.c                           | 2 ++
     5 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
    

    Patch

     

     

     

     

    diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/stackprotector.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/stackprotector.h
    index 91e29b6..9804a79 100644
    --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/stackprotector.h
    +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/stackprotector.h
    @@ -55,8 +55,13 @@ 
     /*
      * Initialize the stackprotector canary value.
      *
    - * NOTE: this must only be called from functions that never return,
    + * NOTE: this must only be called from functions that never return
      * and it must always be inlined.
    + *
    + * In addition, it should be called from a compilation unit for which
    + * stack protector is disabled. Alternatively, the caller should not end
    + * with a function call which gets tail-call optimized as that would
    + * lead to checking a modified canary value.
      */
     static __always_inline void boot_init_stack_canary(void)
     {
    diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
    index 8c89e4d..2f24c33 100644
    --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
    +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
    @@ -266,6 +266,14 @@  static void notrace start_secondary(void *unused)
     
     	wmb();
     	cpu_startup_entry(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_IDLE);
    +
    +	/*
    +	 * Prevent tail call to cpu_startup_entry() because the stack protector
    +	 * guard has been changed a couple of function calls up, in
    +	 * boot_init_stack_canary() and must not be checked before tail calling
    +	 * another function.
    +	 */
    +	prevent_tail_call_optimization();
     }
     
     /**
    diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c b/arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c
    index 8fb8a50..f2adb63 100644
    --- a/arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c
    +++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c
    @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@  asmlinkage __visible void cpu_bringup_and_idle(void)
     	cpu_bringup();
     	boot_init_stack_canary();
     	cpu_startup_entry(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_IDLE);
    +	prevent_tail_call_optimization();
     }
     
     void xen_smp_intr_free_pv(unsigned int cpu)
    diff --git a/include/linux/compiler.h b/include/linux/compiler.h
    index 034b0a6..448c91b 100644
    --- a/include/linux/compiler.h
    +++ b/include/linux/compiler.h
    @@ -356,4 +356,10 @@  static inline void *offset_to_ptr(const int *off)
     /* &a[0] degrades to a pointer: a different type from an array */
     #define __must_be_array(a)	BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(__same_type((a), &(a)[0]))
     
    +/*
    + * This is needed in functions which generate the stack canary, see
    + * arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c::start_secondary() for an example.
    + */
    +#define prevent_tail_call_optimization()	mb()
    +
     #endif /* __LINUX_COMPILER_H */
    diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
    index 1a5da2c..ad3812b 100644
    --- a/init/main.c
    +++ b/init/main.c
    @@ -1036,6 +1036,8 @@  asmlinkage __visible void __init start_kernel(void)
     
     	/* Do the rest non-__init'ed, we're now alive */
     	arch_call_rest_init();
    +
    +	prevent_tail_call_optimization();
     }
     
     /* Call all constructor functions linked into the kernel. */
    
    
  • 相关阅读:
    老大叔开博感想
    模板
    Codeforces Round #685 (Div. 2) 题解
    CF830E Perpetual Motion Machine 题解
    THUWC2020游记
    数论
    后缀数组学习笔记
    Codeforces Round #466 (Div. 2)
    博客停写,搬家到www.54kaikai.com
    lda 主题模型--TOPIC MODEL--Gibbslda++结果分析
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/ztguang/p/13777857.html
Copyright © 2011-2022 走看看