zoukankan      html  css  js  c++  java
  • Operation Overloading in WCF

    1. Is operation overloading valid in WCF?
        overloading means that two methods with the same name but with different parameters. e.g., the following is a valid C# interface definiton:
        interface ICaculator
        {
            int Add(int x,int y);
            double Add(double x,double y);
        }
            However, operation overloading is not valid if we simplely define such following operationcontract in WCF, it will throw an InvalidOperationException.
        interface ICaculator
        {
         int Add(int x,int y);
         double Add(double x,double y);
        //this is not allowed!
        }
    2 How can we overload operation in WCF manually?
            However, we can manualy enable operation overloading. The trick is using the Name property of OperationContract attribute to alias operation:
        [ServiceContract]
        interface ICaculator
        {
            [OperationContract(Name="AddInt")]
            int Add(int x,int y);
            [OperationContract(Name="AddDouble")]
            double Add(double x,double y);
        }
       -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        when the client imports the contracts and generates the proxy automatically, the imported operations will have aliased names:
        [ServiceContract]
        public interface ICalculator
        {
        [OperatonContract]
        int AddInt(int x,int y);
        [OperatonContract]
        double AddDouble(double x,double y);
        }
        public partial class CalCulatorClient:ClientBase<ICaculator>,ICaculator
        {
            public int AddInt(int x,int y)
            {
                return Channel.AddInt(x,y);
            }
             
            public double AddDouble(double x,double  y)
            {
                return Channel.AddDouble(x,y);    
            }
        }
        The client can use the generated proxy and contract as is, However, we can still rework those to realize operation overloading on the client side. and the trick is the same as we did on the server side using Name attribute.
        we can re-code like this.
        public interface ICalculator
        {
            [OperationContract(Name="AddInt")]
            int Add(int x,int y);
            [OperationContract(Name="AddDouble")]
            double Add(double x,double y);
        }
         public partial class CalCulatorClient:ClientBase<ICaculator>,ICaculator
        {
            public int Add(int x,int y)
            {
                return Channel.AddInt(x,y);
            }
             
            public double Add(double x,double  y)
            {
                return Channel.AddDouble(x,y);    
            }
        }

    and then, in the client side, we can consume the services.
        CalCulatorClient cal=new CalCulator();
        cal.Add(1,2);//equals 3
        cal.Add(1.1,2.3);//equals 3.4




  • 相关阅读:
    选择排序
    UVA 10142 Australian Voting(模拟)
    Android Intent 其中一个分析
    leetcode先刷_Merge Two Sorted Lists
    图片缓存负载
    c/c++ 基金会(七) 功能覆盖,虚函数,纯虚函数控制
    Petroglyph访问:中间件游戏
    Cocos2d-x3.0 文件处理
    Qt5官方demo分析集29——Extending QML
    [Phonegap+Sencha Touch] 移动开发34 gem安装compass,不编译scss,怎么办?
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/Winston/p/1158380.html
Copyright © 2011-2022 走看看