zoukankan      html  css  js  c++  java
  • cs224n

    Vanishing Gradients and Fancy RNNs

    Vanishing gradient problem

    图片名称

    Why is vanishing gradient a problem?

    图片名称

    Another explanation: Gradient can be viewed as a measure of
    the effect of the past on the future. If the gradient becomes vanishingly small over longer distances (step t to step t+n), then we can’t tell whether:

    • There’s no dependency between step t and t+n in the data
    • We have wrong parameters to capture the true dependency between t and t+n

    Effect of vanishing gradient on RNN-LM

    图片名称

    Why is exploding gradient a problem?

    If the gradient becomes too big, then the SGD update step
    becomes too big:

    [ heta^{ ext {new}}= heta^{ ext { old }}-alpha abla_{ heta} J( heta) ]

    This can cause bad updates: we take too large a step and reach
    a bad parameter configuration (with large loss). In the worst case, this will result in Inf or NaN in your network (then you have to restart training from an earlier checkpoint).

    Gradient clipping: solution for exploding gradient

    Gradient clipping: if the norm of the gradient is greater than
    some threshold, scale it down before applying SGD update

    Intuition: take a step in the same direction, but a smaller step

    图片名称

    How to fix vanishing gradient problem?

    The main problem is that it’s too difficult for the RNN to learn to preserve information over many timesteps. In a vanilla RNN, the hidden state is constantly being rewritten:

    [oldsymbol{h}^{(t)}=sigmaleft(oldsymbol{W}_{h} oldsymbol{h}^{(t-1)}+oldsymbol{W}_{x} oldsymbol{x}^{(t)}+oldsymbol{b} ight) ]

    Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)

    图片名称
    图片名称

    How does LSTM solve vanishing gradients?

    • The LSTM architecture makes it easier for the RNN to preserve information over many timesteps
    • LSTM doesn’t guarantee that there is no vanishing/exploding gradient, but it does provide an easier way for the model to learn long-distance dependencies

    Gated Recurrent Units (GRU)

    图片名称

    LSTM vs GRU

    • The biggest difference is that GRU is quicker to compute and has fewer parameters
    • There is no conclusive evidence that one consistently performs better than the other
    • LSTM is a good default choice (especially if your data has particularly long dependencies, or you have lots of training data)
    • Rule of thumb: start with LSTM, but switch to GRU if you want something more efficient

    Conclusion: Though vanishing/exploding gradients are a general
    problem, RNNs are particularly unstable due to the repeated
    multiplication by the same weight matrix

    Bidirectional RNNs

    图片名称

    Multi-layer RNNs

    图片名称
  • 相关阅读:
    游戏活动分析
    移动端页面设计指南
    20条开发AIR Native Extension的建议
    Feathers UI 扩展实例 For Starling Framework
    优化 Flash 性能 Flash 开发中心
    简单的不雅词语过滤类
    简单TSql备份所有数据库
    列出Server上5张最大的表
    Asp.net MVC RTM1.0使用NUnit做测试项目
    使用SingleTagSectionHandler实现简单配置节
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/curtisxiao/p/10666150.html
Copyright © 2011-2022 走看看