Lab 10-2

The file for this lab is Lab10-02.exe.

Questions and Short Answers

1. Does this program create any files? If so, what are they?

   A: The program creates the file C:Windows System32 Mlwx486.sys. You can use procmon or another dynamic monitoring tool to see the file being created, but you cannot see the file on disk because it is hidden.

2. Does this program have a kernel component?

   A: The program has a kernel component. It is stored in the file’s resource section, and then written to disk and loaded into the kernel as a service.

3. What does this program do?

   A: The program is a rootkit designed to hide files. It uses SSDT hooking to overwrite the entry to NtQueryDirectoryFile, which it uses to prevent the display of any files beginning with Mlwx (case-sensitive) in directory listings.

Detailed Analysis

Looking at the imports section of this executable, we see imports for CloseServiceHandle, CreateServiceA, OpenSCManagerA, and StartServiceA, which tell us that this program will create and start a service. Because the program also calls CreateFile and WriteFile, we know that it will write to a file at some point. We also see calls to LoadResource and SizeOfResource, which tell us that this program will do something with the resource section of Lab10-02.exe.

Recognizing that the program accesses the resource section, we use Resource Hacker to examine the resource section. There, we see that the file contains another PE header within the resource section, as shown in Figure 10-1L. This is probably another file of malicious code that Lab10-02.exe will use.

Next, we run the program and find that it creates a file and a service. Using procmon, we see that the program creates a file in C:WindowsSystem32, and that it creates a service that uses that file as the executable. That file contains the kernel code that will be loaded by the OS.

We should next find the file that the program creates in order to analyze it and determine what the kernel code is doing. However, when we look in C:WindowsSystem32, we find that there’s nothing there. We can see in procmon that the file is created, and there are no calls that would delete the file. Based on the facts that the file doesn’t appear but we don’t see how it was deleted and that a driver is involved, we should be suspicious that we’re dealing with a rootkit.

Figure 10-1L: An executable file stored in the resource section of Lab10-02.exe

Finding the Rootkit

In order to continue investigating, we want to check to see if our kernel driver is loaded. To do that, we use the sc command to check on the status of the service that is running our kernel driver, as shown in Listing 10-8L.

Listing 10-8L: Using the sc command to get information about a service

We query for the service name 486 WS Driver at ({color{red}1}), which was specified in the call to CreateServiceA. We see at ({color{red}2}) that the service is still running, which tells us that the kernel code is in memory. Something fishy is going on because the driver is still running, but it’s not on disk. Now, to determine what’s going on, we connect the kernel debugger to our virtual machine, and we check to see if the driver was actually loaded using the lm command. We see an entry that matches the filename that was created by Lab10-02.exe:

We are now certain that the driver is loaded into memory with the filename Mlwx486.sys, but the file does not appear on disk, suggesting that this might be a rootkit.

Next, we check the SSDT for any modified entries, as shown in Listing 10-9L.

Listing 10-9L: An excerpt from the SSDT with one entry that has been modified by a rootkit

We see that the entry at ({color{red}1}) is in a memory location that is clearly outside the bounds of the ntoskrnl module but within the loaded Mlwx486.sys driver. To determine which normal function is being replaced, we revert our virtual machine to before the rootkit was installed to see which function was stored at the offset into the SSDT that was overwritten. In this case, the function is NtQueryDirectoryFile, which is a versatile function that retrieves information about files and directories used by FindFirstFile and FindNextFile to traverse directory structures. This function is also used by Windows Explorer to display files and directories. If the rootkit is hooking this function, it could be hiding files, which would explain why we can’t find Mlwx486.sys. Now that we’ve found a function that is hooking the SSDT, we must analyze what that function is doing.

Examining the Hook Function

We now look more closely at the function called instead of NtQueryDirectoryFile, which we’ll call PatchFunction. The malicious PatchFunction must work with the same interface as the original function, so we first check the documentation of the original function. We find that NtQueryDirectoryFile is technically undocumented according to Microsoft, but a quick Internet search will provide all the information we need. The NtQueryDirectoryFile function is a very flexible one with a lot of different parameters that determine what will be returned.

Now, we want to look at the malicious function to see what is being done with the requests. We set a breakpoint on PatchFunction and discover that the first thing it does is call the original NtQueryDirectoryFile with all of the original parameters, as shown in Listing 10-10L.

Listing 10-10L: Assembly listing of PatchFunction

NOTE

It’s probably not completely clear from Listing 10-10L that the function being called is NtQueryDirectoryFile. However, if we single-step over the call function, we see that it goes to another section of the file that jumps to NtQueryDirectoryFile. In IDA Pro, this call would have been labeled NtQueryDirectoryFile, but the disassembler included in WinDbg is much less sophisticated. Ideally, we would have the file to view in IDA Pro while we are debugging, but we can’t find this file because it’s hidden.

The PatchFunction checks the eighth parameter, FileInformationClass, and if it is any value other than 3, it returns NtQueryDirectoryFile’s original return value. It also checks the return value from NtQueryDirectoryFile and the value of the ninth parameter, ReturnSingleEntry. PatchFunction is looking for certain parameters. If the parameters don’t meet the criteria, then the functionality is exactly the same as the original NtQueryDirectoryFile. If the parameters do meet the criteria, PatchFunction will change the return value, which is what we’re interested in. To examine what happens during a call to PatchFunction with the correct parameters, we set a breakpoint on PatchFunction.

If we set a breakpoint on PatchFunction, it will break every time the function is called, but we’re interested in only some of the function calls. This is the perfect time to use a conditional breakpoint so that the breakpoint is hit only when the parameters to PatchFunction match our criteria. We set a breakpoint on PatchFunction, but the breakpoint will be hit only if the value of ReturnSingleEntry is 0, as follows:

kd> bp f7c4d486 ".if dwo(esp+0x24)==0 {} .else {gc}"

NOTE

If you have Windows Explorer open in a directory, you might see this breakpoint hit over and over again in different threads, which could be annoying while you’re trying to analyze the function. To make it easier to analyze, you should close all of your Windows Explorer windows and use the dir command at a command line to trigger the breakpoint.

Once the code filters out interesting calls, we see another function stored at offset 0xf7c4d590. Although it isn’t automatically labeled by WinDbg, we can determine that it is RtlCompareMemory by looking at the disassembly or stepping into the function call. The code in Listing 10-11L shows the call to RtlCompareMemory at ({ color {red} 1 }).

Listing 10-11L: Comparison of the filename to determine whether the rootkit will modify the returned information from NtQueryDirectoryFile

We can now see what PatchFunction is comparing. As shown in Listing 10-11L, the first parameter to RtlCompareMemory is eax, which stores the offset at esi+5eh at ({ color {red} 2 }), which is the offset to a filename. Earlier in our disassembly, we saw that esi was FileInformation, which contains the information filled in by NtQueryDirectoryFile. Examining the documentation for NtQueryDirectoryFile, we see that this is a FILE_BOTH_DIR_INFORMATION structure, and that an offset of 0x5E is where the filename is stored as a wide character string. (We could also use WinDbg to tell us what is stored there.)

To see what is stored at location esi+5eh, we use the db command, as shown in Listing 10-12L. This reveals that the filename is Installer.h.

Listing 10-12L: Examining the first argument to RtlCompareMemory

The other operand of the comparison is the fixed location f7c4d51a, and we can use the db command to view that as well. Listing 10-13L shows that the second parameter to RtlCompareMemory stores the letters Mlwx, which reminds us of the driver Mlwx486.sys.

Listing 10-13L: Examining the second argument to RtlCompareMemory

The call to RtlCompareMemory specifies a size of 8 bytes, which represents four characters in wide character strings. The code is comparing every file to see if it starts with the four characters Mlwx. We now have a pretty good idea that this driver is hiding files that begin with Mlwx.

Hiding Files

Having discovered which filenames PatchFunction will operate on, we analyze how it will change the return values of NtQueryDirectoryFile. Examining the documentation for NtQueryDirectoryFile, we see the FileInformation structure with a series of FILE_BOTH_DIR_INFORMATION structures. The first field in the FILE_BOTH_DIR_INFORMATION structure is the offset that points to the next FILE_BOTH_DIR_INFORMATION. As shown in Figure 10-2L, PatchFunction manipulates this field to hide certain files from the directory listing by moving the offset forward to point to the next entry if the current entry has a filename beginning with Mlwx.

Figure 10-2L shows what the return value of NtQueryDirectoryFile looks like for a directory that contains three files. There is one FILE_BOTH_DIR_INFORMATION structure for each file. Normally, the first structure would point to the second, and the second would point to the third, but the rootkit has modified the structure so that the first structure points to the third, thereby hiding the middle structure. This trick ensures that any files that begin with Mlwx are skipped and hidden from directory listings.

Figure 10-2L: A series of FILE_BOTH_DIR_INFORMATION structures being modified so that the middle structure is hidden

Recovering the Hidden File

Having identified the program that is hiding files, we can try to obtain the original file used by the driver in order to perform additional analysis. There are several ways to do this:

1. Disable the service that starts the driver and reboot. When you reboot, the code won’t be running and the file won’t be hidden.
2. Extract the file from the resource section of the executable file that installed it.
3. Access the file even though it’s not available in the directory listing. The hook to NtQueryDirectoryFile prevents the file from being shown in a directory listing, but the file still exists. For example, you could copy the file using the DOS command copy Mlwx486.sys NewFilename.sys. The NewFilename.sys file would not be hidden.

All of these options are simple enough, but the first is the best because it disables the driver. With the driver disabled, you should first search your system for files beginning with Mlwx in case there are other files being hidden by the Mlwx486.sys driver. (There are none in this case.)

Opening Mlwx486.sys in IDA Pro, we see that it is very small, so we should analyze all of it to make sure that the driver isn’t doing anything else that we’re not aware of. We see that the DriverEntry routine calls RtlInitUnicodeString with KeServiceDescriptorTable and NtQueryDirectoryFile, and then calls MmGetSystemRoutineAddress to find the offsets for those two addresses. It next looks for the entry in the SSDT for NtQueryDirectoryFile and overwrites that entry with the address of the PatchFunction. It doesn’t create a device, and it doesn’t add any function handlers to the driver object.

Preference

恶意代码分析实战 Lab 10-2 习题笔记

PRACTICAL MALWARE ANALYSIS: KERNEL DEBUGGING WITH WINDBG (LAB 10-02)