zoukankan      html  css  js  c++  java
  • MySQL中InnoDB引擎对索引的扩展

    摘要:InnoDB引擎对索引的扩展,自动追加主键值及其对执行计划的影响。

    MySQL中,使用InnoDB引擎的每个表,创建的普通索引(即非主键索引),都会同时保存主键的值。

    比如语句

    CREATE TABLE t1 (
      i1 INT NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
      i2 INT NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
      d DATE DEFAULT NULL,
      PRIMARY KEY (i1, i2),
      INDEX k_d (d)
    ) ENGINE = InnoDB;
    
    

    创建了t1表,其主键为(i1, i2),同时创建了基于d列的索引k_d,但其实在底层,InnoDB引擎将索引k_d扩展成(d,i1,i2)。

    InnoDB引擎这么做,是用空间换性能,优化器在判断是否使用索引及使用哪个索引时会有更多列参考,这样可能生成更高效的执行计划,获得更好的性能。

    优化器在ref、range和index_merge类型的访问,Loose Index Scan访问,连接和排序优化, MIN()/MAX()优化时使都会使用扩展列。

    我们来看个例子:

    root@database-one 15:15:  [gftest]> CREATE TABLE t1 (
        ->   i1 INT NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
        ->   i2 INT NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
        ->   d DATE DEFAULT NULL,
        ->   PRIMARY KEY (i1, i2),
        ->   INDEX k_d (d)
        -> ) ENGINE = InnoDB;
    Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.06 sec)
    
    root@database-one 15:15:  [gftest]> INSERT INTO t1 VALUES
        -> (1, 1, '1998-01-01'), (1, 2, '1999-01-01'),
        -> (1, 3, '2000-01-01'), (1, 4, '2001-01-01'),
        -> (1, 5, '2002-01-01'), (2, 1, '1998-01-01'),
        -> (2, 2, '1999-01-01'), (2, 3, '2000-01-01'),
        -> (2, 4, '2001-01-01'), (2, 5, '2002-01-01'),
        -> (3, 1, '1998-01-01'), (3, 2, '1999-01-01'),
        -> (3, 3, '2000-01-01'), (3, 4, '2001-01-01'),
        -> (3, 5, '2002-01-01'), (4, 1, '1998-01-01'),
        -> (4, 2, '1999-01-01'), (4, 3, '2000-01-01'),
        -> (4, 4, '2001-01-01'), (4, 5, '2002-01-01'),
        -> (5, 1, '1998-01-01'), (5, 2, '1999-01-01'),
        -> (5, 3, '2000-01-01'), (5, 4, '2001-01-01'),
        -> (5, 5, '2002-01-01');
    Query OK, 25 rows affected (0.01 sec)
    Records: 25  Duplicates: 0  Warnings: 0
    
    root@database-one 15:21:  [gftest]> show index from t1;
    +-------+------------+----------+--------------+-------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+---------+---------------+
    | Table | Non_unique | Key_name | Seq_in_index | Column_name | Collation | Cardinality | Sub_part | Packed | Null | Index_type | Comment | Index_comment |
    +-------+------------+----------+--------------+-------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+---------+---------------+
    | t1    |          0 | PRIMARY  |            1 | i1          | A         |           5 |     NULL | NULL   |      | BTREE      |         |               |
    | t1    |          0 | PRIMARY  |            2 | i2          | A         |          25 |     NULL | NULL   |      | BTREE      |         |               |
    | t1    |          1 | k_d      |            1 | d           | A         |           5 |     NULL | NULL   | YES  | BTREE      |         |               |
    +-------+------------+----------+--------------+-------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+---------+---------------+
    3 rows in set (0.01 sec)
    
    

    在普通索引中追加扩展主键是InnoDB在底层做的,show index等语句不显示追加列,但我们可以通过其它方式来验证。看这个SQL

    SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t1 WHERE i1 = 3 AND d = ‘2000-01-01’

    如果InnoDB没有扩展索引,索引k_d为(d),生成的执行计划应该类似这样,使用k_d索引找到d为’2000-01-01’的5行数据,再回表过滤出i1为3的,最后计算count。或者使用主键索引找到i1为3的5行数据,再回表过滤出d为’2000-01-01’的,最后计算count。下面仅示意走k_d索引的情况:

    mysql> EXPLAIN SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t1 WHERE i1 = 3 AND d = '2000-01-01'G
    *************************** 1. row ***************************
               id: 1
      select_type: SIMPLE
            table: t1
             type: ref
    possible_keys: PRIMARY,k_d
              key: k_d
          key_len: 4
              ref: const
             rows: 5
            Extra: Using where; Using index
    
    

    如果InnoDB扩展了索引,索引k_d为(d,i1,i2),这时,优化器可以使用最左边的索引前缀(d,i1),生成的执行计划应该类似这样,使用k_d索引找到d为’2000-01-01’及i1为3的1行数据,然后计算count

    mysql> EXPLAIN SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t1 WHERE i1 = 3 AND d = '2000-01-01'G
    *************************** 1. row ***************************
               id: 1
      select_type: SIMPLE
            table: t1
             type: ref
    possible_keys: PRIMARY,k_d
              key: k_d
          key_len: 8
              ref: const,const
             rows: 1
            Extra: Using index
    
    

    并且d列是DATE类型占4个字节,i1是INT类型占4个字节,所以查询中使用的键值长度就是8个字节(key_len: 8)。

    我们看看实际生成的执行计划

    root@database-one 15:35:  [gftest]> EXPLAIN SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t1 WHERE i1 = 3 AND d = '2000-01-01'G
    *************************** 1. row ***************************
               id: 1
      select_type: SIMPLE
            table: t1
       partitions: NULL
             type: ref
    possible_keys: PRIMARY,k_d
              key: k_d
          key_len: 8
              ref: const,const
             rows: 1
         filtered: 100.00
            Extra: Using index
    1 row in set, 1 warning (0.01 sec)
    
    

    果然跟我们的判断一致,注意执行计划中的细节:

    • key_len从4字节变为8字节,表明键查找使用列d和i1,而不仅仅是d。

    • ref从const更改为const,const,表明查找使用两个键值,而不是一个。

    • rows从5减少到1,表明检索更少的行。

    • Extra从Using where; Using index改为Using index,表示只用索引读取,不必回表。

    InnoDB引擎底层扩展普通索引的情况,也可以通过跟MyISAM引擎对比来进行旁证:

    root@database-one 16:07:  [gftest]> CREATE TABLE t1MyISAM (
        ->   i1 INT NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
        ->   i2 INT NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
        ->   d DATE DEFAULT NULL,
        ->   PRIMARY KEY (i1, i2),
        ->   INDEX k_d (d)
        -> ) ENGINE = MyISAM;
    Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.01 sec)
    
    root@database-one 16:07:  [gftest]> INSERT INTO t1myisam VALUES
        -> (1, 1, '1998-01-01'), (1, 2, '1999-01-01'),
        -> (1, 3, '2000-01-01'), (1, 4, '2001-01-01'),
        -> (1, 5, '2002-01-01'), (2, 1, '1998-01-01'),
        -> (2, 2, '1999-01-01'), (2, 3, '2000-01-01'),
        -> (2, 4, '2001-01-01'), (2, 5, '2002-01-01'),
        -> (3, 1, '1998-01-01'), (3, 2, '1999-01-01'),
        -> (3, 3, '2000-01-01'), (3, 4, '2001-01-01'),
        -> (3, 5, '2002-01-01'), (4, 1, '1998-01-01'),
        -> (4, 2, '1999-01-01'), (4, 3, '2000-01-01'),
        -> (4, 4, '2001-01-01'), (4, 5, '2002-01-01'),
        -> (5, 1, '1998-01-01'), (5, 2, '1999-01-01'),
        -> (5, 3, '2000-01-01'), (5, 4, '2001-01-01'),
        -> (5, 5, '2002-01-01');
    Query OK, 25 rows affected (0.02 sec)
    Records: 25  Duplicates: 0  Warnings: 0
    
    root@database-one 16:07:  [gftest]> EXPLAIN SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t1myisam WHERE i1 = 3 AND d = '2000-01-01'G
    *************************** 1. row ***************************
               id: 1
      select_type: SIMPLE
            table: t1myisam
       partitions: NULL
             type: ref
    possible_keys: PRIMARY,k_d
              key: PRIMARY
          key_len: 4
              ref: const
             rows: 4
         filtered: 16.00
            Extra: Using where
    1 row in set, 1 warning (0.01 sec)
    
    

    可以看到,同样的结构同样的数据,因为MyISAM引擎不会在底层自动扩展普通索引,所以执行计划还是通过主键索引进行处理。

    按照官方手册的说明,也可以用SHOW STATUS命令来验证

    root@database-one 16:12:  [gftest]> FLUSH TABLE t1;
    Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
    
    root@database-one 16:12:  [gftest]> FLUSH STATUS;
    Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.14 sec)
    
    root@database-one 16:12:  [gftest]> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t1 WHERE i1 = 3 AND d = '2000-01-01';
    +----------+
    | COUNT(*) |
    +----------+
    |        1 |
    +----------+
    1 row in set (0.03 sec)
    
    root@database-one 16:12:  [gftest]> SHOW STATUS LIKE 'handler_read%';
    +-----------------------+-------+
    | Variable_name         | Value |
    +-----------------------+-------+
    | Handler_read_first    | 0     |
    | Handler_read_key      | 1     |
    | Handler_read_last     | 0     |
    | Handler_read_next     | 1     |
    | Handler_read_prev     | 0     |
    | Handler_read_rnd      | 0     |
    | Handler_read_rnd_next | 0     |
    +-----------------------+-------+
    7 rows in set (0.01 sec)
    
    root@database-one 16:13:  [gftest]> FLUSH TABLE t1myisam;
    Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.01 sec)
    
    root@database-one 16:13:  [gftest]> FLUSH STATUS;
    Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
    
    root@database-one 16:13:  [gftest]> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t1myisam WHERE i1 = 3 AND d = '2000-01-01';
    +----------+
    | COUNT(*) |
    +----------+
    |        1 |
    +----------+
    1 row in set (0.01 sec)
    
    root@database-one 16:13:  [gftest]> SHOW STATUS LIKE 'handler_read%';
    +-----------------------+-------+
    | Variable_name         | Value |
    +-----------------------+-------+
    | Handler_read_first    | 0     |
    | Handler_read_key      | 1     |
    | Handler_read_last     | 0     |
    | Handler_read_next     | 5     |
    | Handler_read_prev     | 0     |
    | Handler_read_rnd      | 0     |
    | Handler_read_rnd_next | 0     |
    +-----------------------+-------+
    7 rows in set (0.00 sec)
    
    

    Handler_read_next表示在进行索引扫描时,按照索引从数据文件里取数据的次数。使用MyISAM引擎的t1myisam表,Handler_read_next值为5,使用InnoDB引擎的t1表,Handler_read_next值减小到1,就是因为InnoDB引擎对索引进行了主键扩展,读取的次数少,效率更好。

    默认情况下,优化器分析InnoDB表的索引时会考虑扩展列,但如果因为特殊原因让优化器不考虑扩展列,可以使用SET optimizer_switch = 'use_index_extensions=off’设置。

    root@database-one 16:26:  [gftest]> SET optimizer_switch = 'use_index_extensions=off';
    Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.01 sec)
    
    root@database-one 16:26:  [gftest]> EXPLAIN SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t1 WHERE i1 = 3 AND d = '2000-01-01'G
    *************************** 1. row ***************************
               id: 1
      select_type: SIMPLE
            table: t1
       partitions: NULL
             type: ref
    possible_keys: PRIMARY,k_d
              key: PRIMARY
          key_len: 4
              ref: const
             rows: 5
         filtered: 20.00
            Extra: Using where
    1 row in set, 1 warning (0.02 sec)
    
    


    墨天轮原文链接:https://www.modb.pro/db/22927

    推荐阅读:144页!分享珍藏已久的数据库技术年刊


    点击下图查看更多 ↓

    云和恩墨大讲堂 | 一个分享交流的地方

    长按,识别二维码,加入万人交流社群

    请备注:云和恩墨大讲堂

      点个“在看”

    你的喜欢会被看到❤

  • 相关阅读:
    vue自定义指令directive
    vue组件:input数字输入框
    vue中用数组语法绑定class
    vue中检测数组改变
    node绝对和相对模块
    判断拖放
    媒体查询 和rem布局
    JSON字符串对象相互转换
    深度封装typeof判断
    类数组
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/hzcya1995/p/13311763.html
Copyright © 2011-2022 走看看