zoukankan      html  css  js  c++  java
  • Logging vs NoLogging

    You Asked

    My Prod environments is like this.

    Three Node RAC, Active Data guard enabled.

    There is a partitioned table, month based range partition, every month data will be in one partition. Each partition size is 180G to 200G.

    I have another table for archival purpose. We will move 3 partition to archival table from main table every quarter.

    After moving a data to archival table, the index rebuild will take longer time.if drop and recreate index will also be like that and take very longer time.This archival table is also used by application.so index is must. It is global index.

    To move a data from main to archival table and index rebuild on archival, i am afraid to go for NOLOGGING option. If would use this,whay will happen to my SECONDARY db. Will it be sync because no logging and no redo.

    My window to do this activity is 6hrs( i can avoid application connection).

    What is the best method, kindly advise.


    and we said...

    Typically databases with a DataGuard setup have the 'force logging' mode set, so nologging requests are done with logging anyway. So that will be the first thing you would to check.

    You *can* do nologging operations, but once completed, the tablespace/datafiles affected will need to be re-copied to the data guard node(s) because thats the only way the changed data can be seen (because it is not in the redo logs).

    See
    http://docs.oracle.com/database/121/SBYDB/scenarios.htm#SBYDB00920
    for the steps on what to do. Does that 6 hrs apply to your active DG database as well ? Because if it does, it might take longer than that to re-copy those datafiles.
  • 相关阅读:
    C语言C++编程学习:排序原理分析
    Ubuntu下开机进程管理工具sysvrcconf
    康托展开
    USACO 3.2 Magic Squares题解
    『转』ubuntu的电池管理
    poj1061青蛙的约会解题报告
    Dancing Links
    【转】史上最强vim配置文件vimrc
    四柱汉诺塔
    又遇欧拉 转载之
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/login2012/p/6089899.html
Copyright © 2011-2022 走看看