Flink实战（101）：双流join（三）双流中实现Inner Join、Left Join与Right Join

来源：https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/mO2h_HNzx2rwFnOXlRDAJQ

简介

之前文章中提到JoinedStream与CoGroupedStream，例如下列代码：

dataStream.join(otherStream)
    .where(0).equalTo(1)
    .window(TumblingEventTimeWindows.of(Time.seconds(3)))
    .apply { ... }

由于joinedStream与coGroupedStream来自于一个特定的window，且在一个关联上的key中实现，因此，Flink中的双流join一定是在一个基于Inner Join的key的前提下的操作。

双流Join中的Inner、Left、Right Join操作，实际上是指在特定的window范围内的join。即Join的主体是window范围，如果窗口内都没有数据，则不发生join。

具体实现

这里我通过2个Socket接收数据，模拟双流，共3个参数，代码如下：

if (args.length != 3) {
    System.err.println("USAGE:
SocketTextStreamJoinType <hostname> <port1> <port2>")
    return
}

val hostName = args(0)
val port1 = args(1).toInt
val port2 = args(2).toInt

接下来，我们创建了2个case class，来模拟2个socket的输入流数据，代码如下：

case class StockTransaction(tx_time:String, tx_code:String,tx_value:Double)
case class StockSnapshot(md_time:String, md_code:String,md_value:Double)

最后要注意的地方就是如何实现Inner Join、Left Join与Right Join了。这里采用coGroup方式，通过对coGroupFunction中的2个Iterable集合判断是否为空来实现，例如：

if(scalaT1.nonEmpty && scalaT2.nonEmpty){
    for(transaction <- scalaT1){
        for(snapshot <- scalaT2){
        out.collect(transaction.tx_code,transaction.tx_time, snapshot.md_time,transaction.tx_value,snapshot.md_value,"Inner Join Test")
        }
    }
    }
}

完整的代码示例

package wikiedits

import java.text.SimpleDateFormat

import org.apache.flink.api.common.functions.CoGroupFunction
import org.apache.flink.streaming.api.TimeCharacteristic
import org.apache.flink.streaming.api.scala._
import org.apache.flink.streaming.api.windowing.assigners.TumblingEventTimeWindows
import org.apache.flink.streaming.api.windowing.time.Time
import org.apache.flink.util.Collector

object InnerLeftRightJoinTest {

  // *************************************************************************
  // PROGRAM
  // *************************************************************************

  def main(args : Array[String]) : Unit ={
    if (args.length != 3) {
      System.err.println("USAGE:
SocketTextStreamJoinType <hostname> <port1> <port2>")
      return
    }

    val hostName = args(0)
    val port1 = args(1).toInt
    val port2 = args(2).toInt

    /**
      * 获取执行环境以及TimeCharacteristic
      */
    val env = StreamExecutionEnvironment.getExecutionEnvironment
    env.setStreamTimeCharacteristic(TimeCharacteristic.EventTime)

    val dataStream1 = env.socketTextStream(hostName, port1)
    val dataStream2 = env.socketTextStream(hostName, port2)

    val format = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSS")

    /**
      * operator操作
      * 数据格式如下：
      *           TX：2016-07-28 13:00:01.000,000002,10.2
      *           MD: 2016-07-28 13:00:00.000,000002,10.1
      *  这里由于是测试，固水位线采用升序（即数据的Event Time本身是升序输入的）
      */
    val dataStreamMap1 = dataStream1.map(f => {
      val tokens1 = f.split(",")
      StockTransaction(tokens1(0), tokens1(1), tokens1(2).toDouble)
    })
      .assignAscendingTimestamps(f => format.parse(f.tx_time).getTime)

    val dataStreamMap2 = dataStream2.map(f => {
      val tokens2 = f.split(",")
      StockSnapshot(tokens2(0), tokens2(1), tokens2(2).toDouble)
    })
      .assignAscendingTimestamps(f => format.parse(f.md_time).getTime)

    /**
      * Join操作
      * 限定范围是3秒钟的Event Time窗口
      */
    val joinedStream = dataStreamMap1
      .coGroup(dataStreamMap2)
      .where(_.tx_code)
      .equalTo(_.md_code)
      .window(TumblingEventTimeWindows.of(Time.seconds(3)))

    val innerJoinedStream = joinedStream.apply(new InnerJoinFunction)
    val leftJoinedStream = joinedStream.apply(new LeftJoinFunction)
    val rightJoinedStream = joinedStream.apply(new RightJoinFunction)

    innerJoinedStream.name("InnerJoinedStream").print()
    leftJoinedStream.name("LeftJoinedStream").print()
    rightJoinedStream.name("RightJoinedStream").print()

    env.execute("3 Type of Double Stream Join")
  }


  // *************************************************************************
  // USER FUNCTIONS
  // *************************************************************************

  case class StockTransaction(tx_time:String, tx_code:String,tx_value:Double)
  case class StockSnapshot(md_time:String, md_code:String,md_value:Double)

  class InnerJoinFunction extends CoGroupFunction[StockTransaction,StockSnapshot,(String,String,String,Double,Double,String)]{
    override def coGroup(T1: java.lang.Iterable[StockTransaction], T2: java.lang.Iterable[StockSnapshot], out: Collector[(String, String, String, Double, Double,String)]): Unit = {

      /**
        * 将Java中的Iterable对象转换为Scala的Iterable
        * scala的集合操作效率高，简洁
        */
      import scala.collection.JavaConverters._
      val scalaT1 = T1.asScala.toList
      val scalaT2 = T2.asScala.toList

      /**
        * Inner Join要比较的是同一个key下，同一个时间窗口内的数据
        */
      if(scalaT1.nonEmpty && scalaT2.nonEmpty){
        for(transaction <- scalaT1){
          for(snapshot <- scalaT2){
            out.collect(transaction.tx_code,transaction.tx_time, snapshot.md_time,transaction.tx_value,snapshot.md_value,"Inner Join Test")
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }

  class LeftJoinFunction extends CoGroupFunction[StockTransaction,StockSnapshot,(String,String,String,Double,Double,String)] {
    override def coGroup(T1: java.lang.Iterable[StockTransaction], T2: java.lang.Iterable[StockSnapshot], out: Collector[(String, String, String, Double,Double,String)]): Unit = {
      /**
        * 将Java中的Iterable对象转换为Scala的Iterable
        * scala的集合操作效率高，简洁
        */
      import scala.collection.JavaConverters._
      val scalaT1 = T1.asScala.toList
      val scalaT2 = T2.asScala.toList

      /**
        * Left Join要比较的是同一个key下，同一个时间窗口内的数据
        */
      if(scalaT1.nonEmpty && scalaT2.isEmpty){
        for(transaction <- scalaT1){
          out.collect(transaction.tx_code,transaction.tx_time, "",transaction.tx_value,0,"Left Join Test")
        }
      }
    }
  }

  class RightJoinFunction extends CoGroupFunction[StockTransaction,StockSnapshot,(String,String,String,Double,Double,String)] {
    override def coGroup(T1: java.lang.Iterable[StockTransaction], T2: java.lang.Iterable[StockSnapshot], out: Collector[(String, String, String, Double,Double,String)]): Unit = {
      /**
        * 将Java中的Iterable对象转换为Scala的Iterable
        * scala的集合操作效率高，简洁
        */
      import scala.collection.JavaConverters._
      val scalaT1 = T1.asScala.toList
      val scalaT2 = T2.asScala.toList

      /**
        * Right Join要比较的是同一个key下，同一个时间窗口内的数据
        */
      if(scalaT1.isEmpty && scalaT2.nonEmpty){
        for(snapshot <- scalaT2){
          out.collect(snapshot.md_code, "",snapshot.md_time,0,snapshot.md_value,"Right Join Test")
        }
      }
    }
  }
}


/**
  * 用于测试的数据
  */

/**
  * Transaction:
  * 2016-07-28 13:00:01.820,000001,10.2
  * 2016-07-28 13:00:01.260,000001,10.2
  * 2016-07-28 13:00:02.980,000001,10.1
  * 2016-07-28 13:00:03.120,000001,10.1
  * 2016-07-28 13:00:04.330,000001,10.0
  * 2016-07-28 13:00:05.570,000001,10.0
  * 2016-07-28 13:00:05.990,000001,10.0
  * 2016-07-28 13:00:14.000,000001,10.1
  * 2016-07-28 13:00:20.000,000001,10.2
  */

/**
  * Snapshot:
  * 2016-07-28 13:00:01.000,000001,10.2
  * 2016-07-28 13:00:04.000,000001,10.1
  * 2016-07-28 13:00:07.000,000001,10.0
  * 2016-07-28 13:00:16.000,000001,10.1
  */

测试

首先，开启2个socket接口，分别使用9998和9999端口：

root@master:~# nc -lk 9998

r> oot@master:~# nc -lk 9999

其次，打包程序，发布到集群：

mvn clean package

 之后，在socket中模拟输入数据：

root@master:~# nc -lk 9998
2016-07-28 13:00:01.820,000001,10.2
2016-07-28 13:00:01.260,000001,10.2
2016-07-28 13:00:02.980,000001,10.1
2016-07-28 13:00:04.330,000001,10.0
2016-07-28 13:00:05.570,000001,10.0
2016-07-28 13:00:05.990,000001,10.0
2016-07-28 13:00:14.000,000001,10.1
2016-07-28 13:00:20.000,000001,10.2

root@master:~# nc -lk 9999
2016-07-28 13:00:01.000,000001,10.2
2016-07-28 13:00:04.000,000001,10.1
2016-07-28 13:00:07.000,000001,10.0
2016-07-28 13:00:16.000,000001,10.1

最后，看一下输出：

(000001,2016-07-28 13:00:01.820,2016-07-28 13:00:01.000,10.2,10.2,Inner Join Test)
(000001,2016-07-28 13:00:01.260,2016-07-28 13:00:01.000,10.2,10.2,Inner Join Test)
(000001,2016-07-28 13:00:02.980,2016-07-28 13:00:01.000,10.1,10.2,Inner Join Test)
(000001,2016-07-28 13:00:04.330,2016-07-28 13:00:04.000,10.0,10.1,Inner Join Test)
(000001,2016-07-28 13:00:05.570,2016-07-28 13:00:04.000,10.0,10.1,Inner Join Test)
(000001,2016-07-28 13:00:05.990,2016-07-28 13:00:04.000,10.0,10.1,Inner Join Test)
(000001,2016-07-28 13:00:14.000,,10.1,0.0,Left Join Test)
(000001,,2016-07-28 13:00:07.000,0.0,10.0,Right Join Test)

总结

在实际的工作中，coGroupStream的逻辑往往更复杂，例如需要引入state（key/value类型或者List类型），因此要继承RichCoGroupFunction；而且需要考虑延迟的问题（即两个流根据Event Time，接收的数据不同步），导致窗口内经常缺失数据等。这些问题需要更加复杂的管理。