zoukankan      html  css  js  c++  java
  • Subquery typo with using in(转)

    Subquery typo with using in

    Do you use the following syntax?

     
    1. SELECT *
    2.     FROM TABLE
    3.     WHERE COLUMN IN (SELECT COLUMN FROM TABLE)


    OR this?

     
    1. SELECT *
    2.     FROM TABLE
    3.     WHERE COLUMN NOT IN (SELECT COLUMN FROM TABLE)


    Do NOT use that, it will cause problems sooner or later. Don't believe me? Let's take a look

    First create these 2 tables and populate them with some sample data

     
    1. CREATE TABLE TestTable1 (id1 INT)
    2.     CREATE TABLE TestTable2 (id2 INT)
    3.      
    4.     INSERT TestTable1 VALUES(1)
    5.     INSERT TestTable1 VALUES(2)
    6.     INSERT TestTable1 VALUES(3)
    7.      
    8.      
    9.     INSERT TestTable2 VALUES(1)
    10.     INSERT TestTable2 VALUES(2)


    Now let's run the IN query

     
    1. SELECT *
    2.     FROM TestTable1
    3.     WHERE id1 IN (SELECT id2 FROM TestTable2)


    id1
    1
    2


    No problems here right?


    What if by mistake you wrote id1 instead of id2?

     
    1. SELECT *
    2.     FROM TestTable1
    3.     WHERE id1 IN (SELECT id1 FROM TestTable2)


    id1

    1
    2
    3


    Oops all 3 rows are returned, if you just run this SELECT id1 FROM TestTable2 you will get this error Server: Msg 207, Level 16, State 3, Line 1 Invalid column name 'id1'.

    So what happens? SQL Server sees column id1 and says "yes I have that it is in the TestTable1 table, I can use that" What can we do? Use EXISTS because you will get an error instead of a wrong resultset

     
    1. SELECT *
    2.     FROM t1
    3.     WHERE EXISTS (SELECT * FROM TestTable2 t2 WHERE t2.id2 = t1.id1 )


    id1

    1
    2


    A JOIN will do the same as EXISTS

     
    1. SELECT t1.*
    2.     FROM TestTable1 t1
    3.     JOIN TestTable2 t2 ON t2.id2 = t1.id1


    id1

    1
    2


    Now let's try NOT IN


     
    1. SELECT *
    2.     FROM TestTable1
    3.     WHERE id1 NOT IN (SELECT id2 FROM TestTable2)


    id1

    3


    No problem right?

    Add a NULL value to the TestTable2 table

     
    1. INSERT TestTable2 VALUES(NULL)


    Let's try running it again

     
    1. SELECT *
    2.     FROM TestTable1
    3.     WHERE id1 NOT IN (SELECT id2 FROM TestTable2)


    Where are my rows? Nowhere, since NULL is not equal to anything including another NULL SQL just returns nothing

    What happens when you use NOT EXISTS?

     
    1. SELECT *
    2.     FROM TestTable1 t1
    3.     WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM TestTable2 t2 WHERE t2.id2 = t1.id1 )


    id1

    3


    That works without a problem


    What about a LEFT JOIN?

     
    1. SELECT t1.*
    2.     FROM TestTable1 t1
    3.     LEFT JOIN TestTable2 t2 ON t2.id2 = t1.id1
    4.     WHERE t2.id2 IS NULL


    id1

    3


    That works without a problem also


    So from now on use EXISTS, NOT EXISTS, JOIN and LEFT JOIN

    DO NOT use IN or NOT IN ever again!

  • 相关阅读:
    centos 7 安装Telnet并设为开机自启动、开防火墙端口
    cenos 7 中firewalld开放服务端口
    来自鸟哥的lftp客户端软件使用方法
    关闭Linux无用端口
    家用路由器网络设置DMZ区
    Linux中退出循环命令
    shell函数基本概念
    inode节点用尽处理
    xfs格式化、ext4格式化并指定inode区别
    dd备份命令使用
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/qook/p/4914111.html
Copyright © 2011-2022 走看看