![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/None.gif)
2
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/ExpandedBlockStart.gif)
3
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/InBlock.gif)
4
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/InBlock.gif)
5
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/InBlock.gif)
6
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/InBlock.gif)
7
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/InBlock.gif)
8
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/InBlock.gif)
9
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/ExpandedSubBlockStart.gif)
10
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/InBlock.gif)
11
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/InBlock.gif)
12
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/InBlock.gif)
13
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/ExpandedSubBlockEnd.gif)
14
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/InBlock.gif)
15
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/InBlock.gif)
16
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/ExpandedSubBlockStart.gif)
17
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/InBlock.gif)
18
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/ExpandedSubBlockEnd.gif)
19
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/InBlock.gif)
20
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/InBlock.gif)
21
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/ExpandedSubBlockStart.gif)
22
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/InBlock.gif)
23
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/ExpandedSubBlockStart.gif)
24
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/InBlock.gif)
25
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/ExpandedSubBlockStart.gif)
26
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/InBlock.gif)
27
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/ExpandedSubBlockEnd.gif)
28
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/InBlock.gif)
29
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/InBlock.gif)
30
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/ExpandedSubBlockEnd.gif)
31
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/InBlock.gif)
32
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/InBlock.gif)
33
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/ExpandedSubBlockEnd.gif)
34
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/InBlock.gif)
35
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/InBlock.gif)
36
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/ExpandedSubBlockStart.gif)
37
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/InBlock.gif)
38
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/ExpandedSubBlockEnd.gif)
39
![](https://www.cnblogs.com/Images/OutliningIndicators/ExpandedBlockEnd.gif)
这是一种非Abort的结束方式.
这里有个while循环.需要解释一下.
一般来说,多线程运用到生产消费模式的情况比较多.
最典型的:我在一个线程中将数据不断的填入一个队列.
然后开很多线程不断的重队列中取出数据进行处理.
这是,线程的执行方法通常是考虑如下的结构:
WorkProc()
{
while(true)
{
if(队列中有数据)
{
取出一个进行处理。
}
}
}
BX_Thread模型主要对这个模型的循环部分进行了修改。
WorkProc()
{
while(this.IsClosing !=true)
{
if(队列中有数据)
{
取出一个进行处理。
}
}
}
然后提供一个方法:BX_Thread.Close()
只需要将 private bool IsClosing 改为true.
线程就会自己退出循环了。
一但退出循环,线程也就自然死亡而非谋杀了。
所以这个是一种思路。BX_Thread可以这样使用:
首先改写WorkProc()满足你的需求。
BX_Thread thWorker =new BX_Thread( Parameter);
thWorker.Run(1000);
//这里的1000回导致循环一次Sleep1秒。如果Run(0)则不Sleep..
//结束
thWorker.Close();
如果不想改写WorkProc
那么可以考虑做一个接口。将线程和业务分离。
我的意思,还有一点:并不是说Abort没有存在的价值。
有时也会有Abort起来很方便的时候。
但是大多数情况,需要Thread正常结束。
而且用错了结束的方式,也会很麻烦。