The main differences comes from the fact that .NET supports structs (value types), Java doesn't.
In Java, every entry (or message) exchanged by the disruptor needs to inherit from a base class called AbstractEntry. This class exposes the Sequence number required by the disruptor to process the messages, it is basically a header for the message.
In .NET we have replaced AbstractEntry by a generic struct: Entry<T>. An entry contains 2 fields: the sequence number and a field called data, used to store the message (of type T). Using this struct has several advantages:
- the array in the RingBuffer is of type Entry<T>, when we need to access the Sequence number we don't have to dereference (Entry<T> is a struct so instances are directly nested in the array) and this improves cache spatial locality.
- your message types do not need to implement or inherit from a base class, you can use POCOs.
最主要的区别是.NET支持结构类型（结构类型是值类型），而Java不支持。
在Java中，每一个被Disruptor交换的条目（或者消息）需要继承AbstractEntry基类。这个类提供了Disruptor处理消息时必须的序列号。它是消息头中最基本的信息。
在.NET中用泛型结构Entry<T>代替了Java中的AbstractEntry，一个条目包含两个域：一个是序列号，另一个是数据域，用来存储消息（T类型）。用结构有如下几个优点：
- RingBuffer中的数组是Entry<T>类型，当我们需要访问序列号时，不需要解引用，并且能够提高缓存空间的局部性。
- 你的消息类型不需要实现或者继承基类，你可以使用POCOs.