Whenever you see the function keyword within another function, the inner function has access to variables in the outer function.
function foo(x) {
var tmp = 3;
function bar(y) {
alert(x + y + (++tmp));
}
bar(10);
}
foo(2)
This will always alert 16, because bar
can access the x
which was defined as an argument to foo
, and it can also access tmp
from foo
.
That is not a closure. A closure is when you return the inner function. The inner function will close-over the variables of foo
before leaving.
function foo(x) {
var tmp = 3;
return function (y) {
alert(x + y + (++tmp));
}
}
var bar = foo(2); // bar is now a closure.
bar(10);
The above function will also alert 16, because bar
can still refer to x
and tmp
, even though it is no longer directly inside the scope.
However, since tmp
is still hanging around inside bar
's closure, it is also being incremented. It will be incremented each time you call bar
.
(Note for your 6 year old: It is possible to create more than one closure function, either by returning a list of them or by setting them to global variables. All of these will refer to the same x
and the same tmp
, they don't make their own copies.)
Edit: And now to explain the part that isn't obvious.
Here the number x
is a literal number. As with other literals in JavaScript, when foo
is called, the number x
is copied into foo
as its argument x
.
On the other hand, JavaScript always uses references when dealing with Objects. If say, you called foo
with an Object, the closure it returns will reference that original Object!
function foo(x) {
var tmp = 3;
return function (y) {
alert(x + y + tmp);
x.memb = x.memb ? x.memb + 1 : 1;
alert(x.memb);
}
}
var age = new Number(2);
var bar = foo(age); // bar is now a closure referencing age.
bar(10);
As expected, each call to bar(10)
will increment x.memb
. What might not be expected, is that x
is simply referring to the same object as the age
variable! After a couple of calls to bar
, age.memb
will be 2!
This is the basis for memory leaks with HTML objects, but that's a little beyond the scope of this, ahem, article, ahem. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/111102#112265