zoukankan      html  css  js  c++  java
  • 10g和11g,优化器对外连接的处理对比

    我反省,今天面试有个问题没有说清楚。
    我给出的结论(而且这个结论我验证过)是:不要使用不必要的外连接,举了下面这个例子却没有说清楚。虽然最近感冒,状态不是很好,但最擅长的东西都没有表达清楚,泪流满面啊:(
    多谢那位面试官DBA的提醒,我以后要多多注意啊,要把自己擅长的东西说清楚。
    10g:
    test@ORA10G> select * from v$version;
    BANNER
    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.5.0 - 64bi
    PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.5.0 - Production
    CORE 10.2.0.5.0 Production
    TNS for IBM/AIX RISC System/6000: Version 10.2.0.5.0 - Productio
    NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.5.0 - Production
    创建测试环境:
    drop table t1;
    drop table t2;
    create table t1 as select * from dba_objects;
    create table t2 as select * from t1;
    create index i_t2_objectid on t2(object_id) parallel 3;
    alter index i_t2_objectid noparallel;
    analyze table t1 compute statistics for table for all indexes for all indexed columns;
    analyze table t2 compute statistics for table for all indexes for all indexed columns;
    执行SQL并查看其执行计划:
    test@ORA10G> select t1.object_id, t2.object_id, t1.object_name, t2.object_name
    2 from t1, t2
    3 where t1.object_id = t2.object_id(+)
    4 and t2.object_id in (3, 6, 11, 28);

    Execution Plan
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    Plan hash value: 1594007018
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time |
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 4 | 600 | | 32331 (1)| 00:06:28 |
    |* 1 | FILTER | | | | | | |
    |* 2 | HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER| | 4 | 600 | 173M| 32331 (1)| 00:06:28 |
    | 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | T2 | 2196K| 148M| | 7109 (1)| 00:01:26 |
    | 4 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | T1 | 2196K| 165M| | 7110 (1)| 00:01:26 |
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
    ---------------------------------------------------
       1 - filter("T2"."OBJECT_ID"=3 OR "T2"."OBJECT_ID"=6 OR "T2"."OBJECT_ID"=11
    OR "T2"."OBJECT_ID"=28)
    2 - access("T1"."OBJECT_ID"="T2"."OBJECT_ID"(+))

    Statistics
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    1 recursive calls
    0 db block gets
    64216 consistent gets
    0 physical reads
    0 redo size
    855 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
    492 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
    2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
    0 sorts (memory)
    0 sorts (disk)
    4 rows processed
    从上面结果可以看到,即使t2中字段object_id上有索引,在10g中也是用不到的。Oracle先选择将两个表走hash join right outer连接,然后将结果进行filter过滤。

    同样的操作,下面看11g将会怎样处理:
    SQL> select * from v$version;
    BANNER
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
    PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
    CORE 11.2.0.1.0 Production
    TNS for Linux: Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
    创建测试环境:
    drop table t1;
    drop table t2;
    create table t1 as select * from dba_objects;
    create table t2 as select * from t1;
    create index i_t2_objectid on t2(object_id) parallel 3;
    alter index i_t2_objectid noparallel;
    analyze table t1 compute statistics for table for all indexes for all indexed columns;
    analyze table t2 compute statistics for table for all indexes for all indexed columns;
    执行SQL并查看其执行计划:
    SQL> set linesize 400 pagesize 400
    SQL> set autot trace
    SQL>
    SQL> select t1.object_id,t1.object_name,t2.object_id,t2.object_name
    2 from t1,t2
    3 where t1.object_id=t2.object_id(+)
    4 and t2.object_id in (3,6,11,28);

    Execution Plan
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    Plan hash value: 1372208711
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 12 | 1896 | 57 (2)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 1 | HASH JOIN | | 12 | 1896 | 57 (2)| 00:00:01 |
    | 2 | INLIST ITERATOR | | | | | |
    | 3 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T2 | 12 | 948 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 4 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | I_T2_OBJECTID | 4 | | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 5 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | T1 | 131 | 10349 | 51 (0)| 00:00:01 |
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
    ---------------------------------------------------
       1 - access("T1"."OBJECT_ID"="T2"."OBJECT_ID")
    4 - access("T2"."OBJECT_ID"=3 OR "T2"."OBJECT_ID"=6 OR "T2"."OBJECT_ID"=11 OR
    "T2"."OBJECT_ID"=28)
    5 - filter("T1"."OBJECT_ID"=3 OR "T1"."OBJECT_ID"=6 OR "T1"."OBJECT_ID"=11 OR
    "T1"."OBJECT_ID"=28)

    Statistics
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    4 recursive calls
    0 db block gets
    242 consistent gets
    0 physical reads
    0 redo size
    878 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
    523 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
    2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
    0 sorts (memory)
    0 sorts (disk)
    4 rows processed
    从上面可以看出,11g中,Oracle是忽略了外连接的。Oracle在11g中优化器应该做了优化。
    我今天本来想表达的意思是:10g中外连接在这种情况下其实是先两个表full table scan的结果做了hash 外连接,将hash的结果做fillter过滤。而11g会忽略掉外连接,将t2的id列会走索引,然后跟另一个表做join连接。
     
     
     
  • 相关阅读:
    jquery Banner 图片自动轮换显示
    JavaScript:appendDiv(append和appendChild的区别)
    JavaScript:addEventListener()和removeEventListener()追加事件和删除追加事件
    Cesium源码之CesiumMath(1.62版)
    cesium功能插件
    JavaScript之prototype
    JavaScript规范define(AMD)
    Cesium之时间
    Cesium CallbackProperty实例
    pku3620 Avoid The Lakes 查找最大连通湖(简单深搜)
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/zhaoshuangshuang/p/3226408.html
Copyright © 2011-2022 走看看