zoukankan      html  css  js  c++  java
  • in-list expansion

    in-list expansion也被称作or expansion

    --针对in后面是常量集合的另外一种处理方法。优化器会把目标sql中in后面的常量集合拆开,把里面的每个常量都提出来形成一个分支,各分支之间用union all来连接。即in-list expansion本质是把带in的目标sql等价写成union all连接的各个分支。

    in-list expansion改写成union all连接分支后,各个分支可以各自走索引、分区裁剪、表连接等相关的执行计划而不互相干扰;缺点是,改写后,随着union all分支的递加,sql解析时间对增多。

    #先禁掉in-list iterator特性
    SQL> alter session set events '10142 trace name context forever';
    SQL> alter session set events '10157 trace name context forever';
    SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(ownname=>'SCOTT',tabname=>'EMP1',cascade=>true,no_invalidate=>false);
    SQL> select /*+ use_concat +*/ * from emp1 where deptno in (10,20,30);
    SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display_cursor(null,null,'advanced'));
    
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    SQL_ID  2nk52krswqkxk, child number 0
    -------------------------------------
    select /*+ use_concat +*/ * from emp1 where deptno in (10,20,30)
    
    Plan hash value: 1141053746
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    | Id  | Operation                    | Name          | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT             |               |       |       |     6 (100)|          |
    |   1 |  CONCATENATION               |               |       |       |            |          |
    |   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| EMP1          |     3 |   114 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IDX_EMP1_DEPT |     3 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |   4 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| EMP1          |     5 |   190 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  5 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IDX_EMP1_DEPT |     5 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |   6 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| EMP1          |     6 |   228 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  7 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IDX_EMP1_DEPT |     6 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Query Block Name / Object Alias (identified by operation id):
    -------------------------------------------------------------
    
       1 - SEL$1
       2 - SEL$1_1 / EMP1@SEL$1
       3 - SEL$1_1 / EMP1@SEL$1
       4 - SEL$1_2 / EMP1@SEL$1_2
       5 - SEL$1_2 / EMP1@SEL$1_2
       6 - SEL$1_3 / EMP1@SEL$1_3
       7 - SEL$1_3 / EMP1@SEL$1_3
    
    	......
    
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
    ---------------------------------------------------
    
       3 - access("DEPTNO"=10)
       5 - access("DEPTNO"=20)
       7 - access("DEPTNO"=30)
    

    in-list expansion后,上面的语句其实被改写成下面的格式了:

    select * from emp1 where deptno=10
    union all
    select * from emp1 where deptno=20
    union all
    select * from emp1 where deptno=30
    union all;
    

    要想优化器不走in-list expansion,需要使用no_expand hint

    SQL> select /*+ no_expand +*/ * from emp1 where deptno in (10,20,30);
    SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display_cursor(null,null,'advanced'));
    
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    SQL_ID  akwm5wds8km03, child number 0
    -------------------------------------
    select /*+ no_expand +*/ * from emp1 where deptno in (10,20,30)
    
    Plan hash value: 2226897347
    
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    | Id  | Operation         | Name | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT  |      |       |       |     3 (100)|          |
    |*  1 |  TABLE ACCESS FULL| EMP1 |    10 |   380 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    

      

    对于in后面常量集合中所含元素数量非常多的情形(或or条件比较多的sql,OR关联词在CBO解析时,会变形(EXPAND)为UNION ALL的关联语句),可以考虑以下的优化方案:
    1.使用no_expand hint不让cbo走in-list expansion类型的执行计划
    2.将in后面的常量集合存储在一个中间表里,并将原始目标sql中的in改写成和这个表中间表做表连接

    可以参考别人的优化示例:http://blog.itpub.net/26687597/viewspace-1207432/

  • 相关阅读:
    设置打印 页面 方向与大小
    设置对齐
    设置字体
    SVN版本管理与大型代码上线方案(一)
    项目案例之Pipeline流水线及流水线发布PHP项目(二)
    Jenkins企业应用进阶详解(一)
    iptables 防火墙(下)
    iptables 防火墙(上)
    zabbix生产环境案例(三)
    深入理解zabbix(二)
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/abclife/p/5992919.html
Copyright © 2011-2022 走看看