zoukankan      html  css  js  c++  java
  • django自带wsgi server vs 部署uwsgi+nginx后的性能对比

    一.下面先交代一下测试云主机

    cpu:

    root@alexknight:/tmp/webbench-1.5# cat /proc/cpuinfo |grep model
    model        : 69
    model name    : Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4260U CPU @ 1.40GHz
    root@alexknight:/tmp/webbench-1.5#

    mem:

    root@alexknight:/tmp/webbench-1.5# free -m
                 total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
    Mem:           490        364        125          3         41        103
    -/+ buffers/cache:        219        270
    Swap:          509        208        301

    二.测试对比

    测试工具为webbench.

    • 下面是django自带wsgi webserver的性能
    root@alexknight:/tmp/webbench-1.5# webbench -c 20 -t 30 http://115.28.21.25:8008/
    Webbench - Simple Web Benchmark 1.5
    Copyright (c) Radim Kolar 1997-2004, GPL Open Source Software.
    
    Benchmarking: GET http://115.28.21.25:8008/
    20 clients, running 30 sec.
    
    Speed=554 pages/min, 129959 bytes/sec.
    Requests: 277 susceed, 0 failed.

    大概能承受20路并发,当上升到25路时,会开始出现失败请求。

    • 下面用uwsgi+nginx取代自带的wsgi server
    root@alexknight:/tmp/webbench-1.5# webbench -c 170 -t 30 http://115.28.21.25:8000/
    Webbench - Simple Web Benchmark 1.5
    Copyright (c) Radim Kolar 1997-2004, GPL Open Source Software.
    
    Benchmarking: GET http://115.28.21.25:8000/
    170 clients, running 30 sec.
    
    Speed=640 pages/min, 126746 bytes/sec.
    Requests: 320 susceed, 0 failed.

    大概能承受170路并发,效果还算明显的,当请求继续上升时,就会开始出现失败请求。

  • 相关阅读:
    TCP心跳 | TCP keepAlive(转)
    闲说HeartBeat心跳包和TCP协议的KeepAlive机制
    一个DNS统计,RCFs,工具站点
    JMX
    【转】如何实现一个配置中心
    用Netty开发中间件:高并发性能优化
    UDP server & client
    DNS缓存
    C正则库做DNS域名验证时的性能对比
    DNS压力测试工具dnsperf简介
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/alexkn/p/4416008.html
Copyright © 2011-2022 走看看