luanet性能测试

测试环境 intel-i5 双核 2.53HZ 服务器客户端均在本机运行

测试内容:echo回射,每个包的字节数在20字节内

luanet

连接数    每秒回射数            
1         19,000/s
10        12,5000/s
100       12,0000/s
1000      80,000/s 

node.js

连接数    每秒回射数            
1         27,000/s
10        30,000/s
100       30,000/s
1000      27,000/s

luvit

连接数    每秒回射数            
1         16,500/s
10        74,000/s
100       75,000/s
1000      51,000/s

从测试结果上看只有在1个连接的情况下luanet不如node.js,当连接数上去之后 luanet每秒的回射数基本都在

node.js的3倍左右.在所有的连接数下都比luvit 高30%以上.

node.js:echo.js

 var net = require('net');
    var server = net.createServer(function(c) { // 'connection' 监听器
      console.log('一个新连接');
      c.on('end', function() {
        console.log('连接断开');
      });
      c.on('data',function(data){
        c.write(data);
      });
      c.on('close',function(){
          console.log('连接断开');
      });   
      c.on('error',function(e){
      });  
    });
    server.listen(8010, function() { // 'listening' 监听器
      console.log('服务器监听8010');
    });

luvit:echo.lua

local net = require('net')

net.createServer(function (client)
  -- Echo everything the client says back to itself
  client:pipe(client)
end):listen(8010)

print("TCP echo server listening on port 8010")

luanet:echoserver.lua

local cjson = require "cjson"

function on_data(s,data,err)
    if not data then
        print("a client disconnected")
        C.close(s)
    else
        local tb = cjson.decode(data)
        C.send(s,cjson.encode(tb),nil)
    end
end

function on_newclient(s)
    print("on_newclient")
    if not C.bind(s,{recvfinish = on_data})then
        print("bind error")
        C.close(s)
    end
end

C.listen(IPPROTO_TCP,SOCK_STREAM,net.netaddr_ipv4("127.0.0.1",8010),
         {onaccept=on_newclient})

统一的测试客户端:echoclient.lua

local net = require "lua/netaddr"
local cjson = require "cjson"
local Sche = require "lua/scheduler"
local count = 0

function on_data(s,data,err)
    if not data then
        print("a client disconnected")
        C.close(s)
    else
        count = count + 1
        local tb = cjson.decode(data)
        C.send(s,cjson.encode(tb),nil)
    end
end

function on_connected(s,remote_addr,err)
    print("on_connected")
    if s then
        if not C.bind(s,{recvfinish = on_data}) then
            print("bind error")
            C.close(s)
        else
            print("bind success")
            C.send(s,cjson.encode({"hahaha"}),nil)
        end
    end 
end
print("echoclient")
for i=1,1 do
    C.connect(IPPROTO_TCP,SOCK_STREAM,net.netaddr_ipv4("127.0.0.1",8010),
              nil,{onconnected = on_connected},3000)
end

local tick = C.GetSysTick()
local now = C.GetSysTick()
while true do 
    now = C.GetSysTick()
    if now - tick >= 1000 then
        print(count*1000/(now-tick) .. " " .. now-tick)
        tick = now
        count = 0
    end
    Sche.Sleep(50)
end

luanet rpc测试：客户端调用服务端的Plus函数,函数只是把客户端提供的两个参数相加并返回

平均每秒rpc调用次数在6,8000左右.而用C+协程实现的版本在70,0000左右.我试着用luajit来运行 同样的测试,非常意外的是性能差了一大截,

只有可怜的2,000次,具体原因还在调查中.

测试代码:server.lua,client.lua