zoukankan      html  css  js  c++  java
  • Why should a selfimplemented getter retain and autorelease the returned object

    -(id)getMyInstance
        {return myInstanceVar ;}

    or

    -(id)getMyInstance
    {return[[myInstanceVar retain] autorelease];}

    What's the difference ? The second one allows the caller to get an instance variable of a container object, dispose of the container and continue to play with the instance variable until the next release of the current autoreleased pool, without being hurt by the release of the instance variable indirectly generated by the release of its container:

    aLocalVar =[aContainer getAnInstanceVar];[aContainer release];
    doSomething(aLocalVar);

    If the "get" is implemented in the first form, you should write:

    aLocalVar =[[aContainer getAnInstanceVar] retain];[aContainer release];
    doSomething(aLocalVar);[aLovalVar release];

    The first form is a little bit more efficent in term of code execution speed. However, if you are writing frameworks to be used by others, maybe the second version should be recommanded: it makes life a little bit easier to people using your framework: they don't have to think too much about what they are doing…;) If you choose the first style version, state it clearly in your documentation… Whatever way you will be choosing, remember that changing from version 1 to version 2 is save for client code, when going back from version 2 to version 1 will break existing client code…

    Compare this code

    return[[title retain] release];// releases immediately

    with this

    return[[title retain] autorelease];// releases at end of current run loop (or if autorelease pool is drained earlier)

    The second one guarantees that a client will have a non-dealloced object to work with.

    This can be useful in a situation like this (client code):

    NSString*thing =[obj title];[obj setTitle:nil];// here you could hit retainCount 0!NSLog(@"Length %d",[thing length]);// here thing might be dealloced already!

    The retain (and use of autorelease instead of release) in your title method prevents this code from blowing up. The autoreleased object will not have its release method called until AFTER the current call stack is done executing (end of the current run loop). This gives all client code in the call stack a chance to use this object without worrying about it getting dealloc'ed.

    The Important Thing To Remember: This ain't Java, Ruby or PHP. Just because you have a reference to an object in yer [sic] variable does NOT ensure that you won't get it dealloc'ed from under you. You have to retain it, but then you'd have to remember to release it. Autorelease lets you avoid this. You should always use autorelease unless you're dealing with properties or loops with many iterations (and probably not even then unless a problem occurs).

     
  • 相关阅读:
    流量染色与gRPC服务托管 微服务协作开发、灰度发布之流量染色 灰度发布与流量染色
    http://www.cnblogs.com/sealedbook/p/6194047.html
    celery 原理
    修改织梦默认栏目页、文章页URL命名规则
    Dede首页幻灯版显示Bug修正
    DEDECMS5.7 首页和栏目页调用文章按权重排序
    dede文章摘要字数的设置方法
    DEDECMS登录后台慢的完美解决方案
    DedeCMS去掉友情链接中“织梦链投放”“织梦链”的方法
    删除dedecms5.7后台登陆验证码
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/zhangjie/p/3131367.html
Copyright © 2011-2022 走看看