zoukankan      html  css  js  c++  java
  • AI Planning for Semantic Web Service Composition?

    今天看了下这个ppt 摘录点文字:

    Jim Hendler's opinion: 01/02/2004 public-sws-ig@w3.org:

    Let's start with a pessimistic view…:

    I would point out that the mapping of web services to compositions has largely been done in the past, even in the best work in


    this area, with some simplifications that generally "twist" web services into a planning framework -- there's huge parts of the


    web service world that need to be explored before we can really say AI planning has shown a success in web services other


    than as an evocative idea --  the reason is that a real web services engine will need to deal with (at least):


    scaling issues way beyond anything we've seen in planning to date (there may be thousands of services each with multiple ports, optional

    arguments, etc.)

    the issues Dana mentioned (side effects, change in the world, etc.) that make Strips-operators planning an approximation at best (the

    assumption that change occurs only through the operators under the control of this planner is clearly wrong)

    issues of interaction with users - web service planning better be more mixed-initiative

    issues of preferences v. constraints

    issues of interaction between planning agents out there (you buy the book I'm in the process of planning to buy)

    knowledge engineering issues (when planners take ebXML and WSDL as inputs, instead of requiring specialized planning-like languages


    like
      OWL-S, then we'll see a lot more excitement on the outside - OWL-S is an interesting starting place,  but we fool ourselves if


    we think it really is going to be widely used for process specification in its current form)

    In fact, I'll wager that it will be absolutely trivial to prove that web services planning, even w/simplifications, is inherently


    undecidable, so we'll need to explore a lot of the issues from the old "dynamic planning" world as well. All this, by the way,  I


    see as good news - it means this is a fertile and exciting research area for those of us in planning, with good heuristic solutions


    being transitionable. That said, in the past I have tried to get AI planning people to think outside the box and failed miserably,


    and I'll be surprised if the web services planning stuff doesn't become an "applied" area being ignored by the bulk of the


    research community (who, if you'll apologize my saying so, still have their heads up their you-know-whats worrying about


    scaling simple problems in all the wrong ways)


    Forgive my pessimism, but the planning community has spent many years resisting change - I don't see why just because we


    have a new and potentially revolutionary problem  that could expand the field greatly, the leopards will change their spots...


    -Jim Hendler


    悲观的看法,改ppt还讨论了现有的问题,解决方法,特别是提出wsmo这个来改进一些问题。

  • 相关阅读:
    html总结:背景图片拉伸
    html总结:表格中的文字居中
    html总结:float实现span和input输入框同行
    servlet总结:Servlet基础
    js总结:JavaScript入门
    河北科技创新平台年报系统涉众分析
    确定业务问题的范围-上下文的范围模型
    问题账户需求分析
    Struts2------OGNL表达式
    Struts入门
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/zhxiaomiao/p/1419540.html
Copyright © 2011-2022 走看看