Creative artists should be given the freedom to express their ideas (through words, pictures, music or films). However, some people think government should impose certain restrictions on them. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In a real democracy people should enjoy the freedom of speech. Everyone should be able to freely express his or her ideas and views. This kind of freedom must not be curtailed when it comes to artistic creations.
Freedom of speech is a basic right for all citizens, more so for artists. The ideas of an artist are often expressed not in his speeches but through his artistic work. Everyone should have the right to tell the truth and his true feelings. The denying of freedom is a kind of oppression. Only a government without the mandate of its people would fear free speech. All dictators, for example, never allow the people to criticize the government.
Art is all but impossible without the freedom of expression. Art is a reflection of the real world; artists reproduce the world as they see it. An artist may choose any part of the world as his subject and approach from his unique angle. No two artists perceive the world in quite the same way. If restrictions are imposed on certain areas and subjects, if artists can only approach an issue in ways approved by the authority, and if they are in fear of being thrown into prison by truly expressing their ideas, art ceases to be art.
Of course, artists should abide by the law while enjoying the freedom of expression. Therefore, their art work cannot be pornographic for example. They must not slander other people or spread vicious lies. Freedom doesn't mean doing whatever you like but doing whatever you like so long as you don't infringe on others' freedom or rights.
Therefore, governments should not impose censorship or restrictions on artistic creation. Artist should have their freedom of expression as long as this freedom is not used as an excuse for illegal activities.
Reference:
剑桥雅思写作高分范文
在京东购买：剑桥雅思写作高分范文
在亚马逊购买：剑桥雅思写作真题范文百篇