zoukankan      html  css  js  c++  java
  • Zabbix housekeeper processes more than 75% busy

    原因分析

     

    为了防止数据库持续增大,Zabbix有自动删除历史数据的机制,即housekeeper,而在频繁清理历史数据的时候,MySQL数据库可能出现性能降低的情况,此时就会告警。

     

    一般来说,Zabbix都会监控Zabbix Server本身。如下所示,我们可以分析Zabbix server: Utilization of housekeeper internal processes, in %图形,通过分析,我们可以看到Zabbix housekeeper processes1032分的时候, housekeeper进程突然开始繁忙。

     

    clip_image001

     

    拉长时间范围的截图如下所示:

     

    clip_image002

     

     

    如需进一步分析,那么就必须查看MySQL的慢查询日志:

     

    mysql> show variables like '%slow_query%';
    +---------------------+-------------------------------------+
    | Variable_name       | Value                               |
    +---------------------+-------------------------------------+
    | slow_query_log      | ON                                  |
    | slow_query_log_file | /mysql_data/mysql/xxxx-slow.log |
    +---------------------+-------------------------------------+
    2 rows in set (0.01 sec)

     

     

    #注意,如果没有设置过的话,这里默认是UTC时间。所以跟东八区时间有所区别。

    # Time: 2020-08-26T02:34:56.354162Z
    # User@Host: zabbix[zabbix] @ localhost []  Id: 345463
    # Query_time: 13.832335  Lock_time: 0.000088 Rows_sent: 0  Rows_examined: 5000
    SET timestamp=1598409282;
    delete from history where itemid=37078 limit 5000;
    # Time: 2020-08-26T02:35:00.377783Z
    # User@Host: zabbix[zabbix] @ localhost []  Id: 345463
    # Query_time: 4.023518  Lock_time: 0.000126 Rows_sent: 0  Rows_examined: 5000
    SET timestamp=1598409296;
    delete from history where itemid=37079 limit 5000;
    # Time: 2020-08-26T02:35:36.848120Z
    # User@Host: zabbix[zabbix] @ localhost []  Id: 345463
    # Query_time: 21.513432  Lock_time: 0.000094 Rows_sent: 0  Rows_examined: 5000
    SET timestamp=1598409315;
    delete from history where itemid=37099 limit 5000;
    # Time: 2020-08-26T02:35:46.705206Z
    # User@Host: zabbix[zabbix] @ localhost []  Id: 345463
    # Query_time: 9.856468  Lock_time: 0.000124 Rows_sent: 0  Rows_examined: 5000
    SET timestamp=1598409336;
    delete from history where itemid=37100 limit 5000;
    # Time: 2020-08-26T02:36:43.856421Z
    # User@Host: zabbix[zabbix] @ localhost []  Id: 345463
    # Query_time: 38.186585  Lock_time: 0.000039 Rows_sent: 0  Rows_examined: 5000
    SET timestamp=1598409365;
    delete from history where itemid=38789 limit 5000;
    # Time: 2020-08-26T02:36:59.432174Z
    # User@Host: zabbix[zabbix] @ localhost [127.0.0.1]  Id: 345563
    # Query_time: 8.542213  Lock_time: 0.000084 Rows_sent: 20  Rows_examined: 7298
    SET timestamp=1598409410;
    SELECT DISTINCT e.eventid,e.clock,e.ns,e.objectid,e.acknowledged,er1.r_eventid FROM events e LEFT JOIN event_recovery er1 ON er1.eventid=e.eventid WHERE e.sou
    rce='0' AND e.object='0' AND e.objectid=26811 AND e.eventid<='3437835' AND e.value=1 ORDER BY e.eventid DESC LIMIT 20;
    # Time: 2020-08-26T02:37:02.317422Z
    # User@Host: zabbix[zabbix] @ localhost []  Id: 345463
    # Query_time: 18.460853  Lock_time: 0.000101 Rows_sent: 0  Rows_examined: 5000
    SET timestamp=1598409403;
    delete from history where itemid=38790 limit 5000;

     

    clip_image003  

     

    另外,Zabbix Server也会将慢查询SQL写入zabbix_server.log中,如下所示。

     

    # grep "slow query" zabbix_server.log

     

        clip_image004

     

     

     

    通过分析,我们可以发现MySQL在删除historyhistry_unit数据。经过分析,这里突然出现 housekeeper进程繁忙,是因为我删除了模板Zabbix template for Microsoft SQL Server,并勾选了Clear,所以导致Zabbix Server需要删除大量的数据。当然这个只是一个诱因,本身history变得非常大才是一个重要的原因。你可以通过下面脚本,查看一下这些表的Size大小信息。

     

    SELECT TABLE_SCHEMA
        ,  TABLE_NAME
        , (DATA_LENGTH/1024/1024)     AS DATA_SIZE_MB 
        , (INDEX_LENGTH/1024/1024)  AS INDEX_SIZE_MB
        , ((DATA_LENGTH+INDEX_LENGTH)/1024/1024) AS TABLE_SIZE_MB
        , TABLE_ROWS 
    FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES 
    WHERE table_schema = 'zabbix'
    ORDER BY TABLE_SIZE_MB ASC;

     

    解决方案

     

     

    一般短时间出现这样的告警可以忽略,如果一直出现这个告警的话,我们就应该调整参数HousekeepingFrequencyMaxHousekeeperDelete

     

     

    Zabbix 5.x下面,默认情况下HousekeepingFrequency值为1,表示一小时执行一次。 MaxHousekeeperDelete表示一次删除5000条记录。如下所示

     

    # grep -C 1 HousekeepingFrequency /etc/zabbix/zabbix_server.conf
     
    ### Option: HousekeepingFrequency
    #       How often Zabbix will perform housekeeping procedure (in hours).
    #       Housekeeping is removing outdated information from the database.
    #       To prevent Housekeeper from being overloaded, no more than 4 times HousekeepingFrequency
    #       hours of outdated information are deleted in one housekeeping cycle, for each item.
    #       To lower load on server startup housekeeping is postponed for 30 minutes after server start.
    #       With HousekeepingFrequency=0 the housekeeper can be only executed using the runtime control option.
    #       In this case the period of outdated information deleted in one housekeeping cycle is 4 times the
    --
    # Default:
    # HousekeepingFrequency=1
     
     
    # grep -C 1 MaxHousekeeperDelete  /etc/zabbix/zabbix_server.conf
     
    ### Option: MaxHousekeeperDelete
    #       The table "housekeeper" contains "tasks" for housekeeping procedure in the format:
    #       [housekeeperid], [tablename], [field], [value].
    #       No more than 'MaxHousekeeperDelete' rows (corresponding to [tablename], [field], [value])
    #       will be deleted per one task in one housekeeping cycle.
    --
    # Default:
    # MaxHousekeeperDelete=5000

     

     

     

    HousekeepingFrequency介绍:

     

     

    Zabbix 执行housekeeping 的频率 (单位为小时)

    housekeeping负责从数据库中删除过期的信息。

    注意: 为了防止 housekeeper 负载过大 (例如, 当历史和趋势周期大大减小时), 对于每一个监控项,不会在一个housekeeping周期内删除超过4HousekeepingFrequency 的过期数据。 因此, 如果 HousekeepingFrequency 1小时, 一个周期内不会删除超过4小时的过期信息 (从最旧的数据开始)

    备注: 为降低 server压力, housekeeping将在server启动以后,延迟30分钟执行。 因此, 如果 HousekeepingFrequency 1小时,serverg启动30分后执行第一次 housekeeping , 然后按1小时为周期重复执行。从Zabbix 2.4.0以后有了这种延迟行为。

    Zabbix 3.0.0开始,可以设置HousekeepingFrequency0来禁止自动housekeeping。 此时 housekeeping 只能通过 housekeeper_execute 启动, 在一个housuekeeping周期内删除的过期信息时长为从最后一次housekeeping以来到配置周期的4,不少于4小时且不大于4天。

     

    MaxHousekeeperDelete介绍:

     

    Zabbix 1.8.2 开始支持该参数,如果MaxHousekeeperDelete设置为0,表示不限制删除的行数。当然不建议这么做。它仅适用于那些准备删除的历史数据和历史趋势数据。

     

     

    一般是通过将housekeeper进程做归档的时间间隔调大,一次删除数据的量放大来解决问题。至于这个值到底多大合适,没有统一标准。要根据实际情况、测试才能给出一个合适的值。

     

    HousekeepingFrequency=6           #间隔时间6小时
    MaxHousekeeperDelete=10000        #最大删除量

     

     

     

    在这个案例中,将MaxHousekeeperDelete调整为100000,发现delete操作反而慢了许多。如下所示:

     

    836378:20200826:161213.441 slow query: 773.254950 sec, "delete from history where itemid=45251 limit 100000"

    836378:20200826:162435.978 slow query: 742.537260 sec, "delete from history where itemid=46694 limit 100000"

    836378:20200826:163329.011 slow query: 532.932137 sec, "delete from history where itemid=51313 limit 100000"

    836378:20200826:163842.539 slow query: 313.528311 sec, "delete from history where itemid=52664 limit 100000"

     

    如果我将MaxHousekeeperDelete调整为10000的话,发现delete的性能还是要快一些。所以,这个不妨多测试验证一下。

     

     

    943980:20200826:233157.246 slow query: 5.393617 sec, "delete from history where itemid=37769 limit 10000"

    943980:20200826:233202.914 slow query: 5.667551 sec, "delete from history where itemid=38407 limit 10000"

    943980:20200826:233208.044 slow query: 5.129767 sec, "delete from history where itemid=41283 limit 10000"

    943980:20200826:233217.462 slow query: 7.011403 sec, "delete from history where itemid=37770 limit 10000"

    943980:20200826:233222.516 slow query: 5.053935 sec, "delete from history where itemid=38408 limit 10000"

    943980:20200826:233227.286 slow query: 4.769753 sec, "delete from history where itemid=41284 limit 10000"

     

     

    另外,还有一些方法,例如减少历史数据的保留时间、对history等大表进行分区,也可以避免或减少这个告警出现的概率。根据个人的经验,如果像history表变得非常大以后,即使调整上面参数,其实效果并不明显。需要通过分区或手工清理历史数据来解决。这样效果才显著。

  • 相关阅读:
    2019牛客暑期多校训练营(第二场)H Second Large Rectangle
    HDU -1506 Largest Rectangle in a Histogram&&51nod 1158 全是1的最大子矩阵 (单调栈)
    吉哥系列故事——完美队形II(马拉车算法)
    Theme Section
    激光雷达和毫米波雷达
    模型压缩95%:Lite Transformer,MIT韩松等人
    分布式深度学习DDL解析
    TOF摄像机可以替代Flash激光雷达吗?
    毫米波雷达分类和技术方案
    高精地图与自动驾驶(下)
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/kerrycode/p/13570463.html
Copyright © 2011-2022 走看看