zoukankan      html  css  js  c++  java
  • C#

    

    The choice of whether to design your functionality as an interface or an abstract class can sometimes be a difficult one. An abstract class is a class that cannot be instantiated, but must be inherited from. An abstract class may be fully implemented, but is more usually partially implemented or not implemented at all, thereby encapsulating common functionality for inherited classes.

    An interface, by contrast, is a totally abstract set of members that can be thought of as defining a contract for conduct. The implementation of an interface is left completely to the developer.

    Both interfaces and abstract classes are useful for component interaction. If a method requires an interface as an argument, then any object that implements that interface can be used in the argument. Abstract classes also allow for this kind of polymorphism, but with a few caveats:

    • Classes may inherit from only one base class, so if you want to use abstract classes to provide polymorphism to a group of classes, they must all inherit from that class.
    • Abstract classes may also provide members that have already been implemented. Therefore, you can ensure a certain amount of identical functionality with an abstract class, but cannot with an interface.

    Here are some recommendations to help you to decide whether to use an interface or an abstract class to provide polymorphism for your components.

    • If you anticipate creating multiple versions of your component, create an abstract class. Abstract classes provide a simple and easy way to version your components. By updating the base class, all inheriting classes are automatically updated with the change. Interfaces, on the other hand, cannot be changed once created. If a new version of an interface is required, you must create a whole new interface.
    • If the functionality you are creating will be useful across a wide range of disparate objects, use an interface. Abstract classes should be used primarily for objects that are closely related, whereas interfaces are best suited for providing common functionality to unrelated classes.
    • If you are designing small, concise bits of functionality, use interfaces. If you are designing large functional units, use an abstract class.
    • If you want to provide common, implemented functionality among all implementations of your component, use an abstract class. Abstract classes allow you to partially implement your class, whereas interfaces contain no implementation for any members.

    版权声明:本文博主原创文章。博客,未经同意不得转载。

  • 相关阅读:
    lintcode:Find the Connected Component in the Undirected Graph 找出无向图汇总的相连要素
    lintcode:Recover Rotated Sorted Array恢复旋转排序数组
    lintcode:Number of Islands 岛屿的个数
    lintcode :Trailing Zeros 尾部的零
    lintcode:Flip Bits 将整数A转换为B
    lintcode:strStr 字符串查找
    lintcode:Subtree 子树
    lintcode 容易题:Partition Array by Odd and Even 奇偶分割数组
    lintcode:在二叉查找树中插入节点
    lintcode:在O(1)时间复杂度删除链表节点
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/mengfanrong/p/4803265.html
Copyright © 2011-2022 走看看