zoukankan      html  css  js  c++  java
  • What is the Makefile Target `.c.o` for?

    10.7 Old-Fashioned Suffix Rules

    Suffix rules are the old-fashioned way of defining implicit rules for make. Suffix rules are obsolete because pattern rules are more general and clearer. They are supported in GNU make for compatibility with old makefiles. They come in two kinds: double-suffix and single-suffix.

    A double-suffix rule is defined by a pair of suffixes: the target suffix and the source suffix. It matches any file whose name ends with the target suffix. The corresponding implicit prerequisite is made by replacing the target suffix with the source suffix in the file name. A two-suffix rule ‘.c.o’ (whose target and source suffixes are ‘.o’ and ‘.c’) is equivalent to the pattern rule ‘%.o : %.c’.

    A single-suffix rule is defined by a single suffix, which is the source suffix. It matches any file name, and the corresponding implicit prerequisite name is made by appending the source suffix. A single-suffix rule whose source suffix is ‘.c’ is equivalent to the pattern rule ‘% : %.c’.

    Suffix rule definitions are recognized by comparing each rule’s target against a defined list of known suffixes. When make sees a rule whose target is a known suffix, this rule is considered a single-suffix rule. When make sees a rule whose target is two known suffixes concatenated, this rule is taken as a double-suffix rule.

    For example, ‘.c’ and ‘.o’ are both on the default list of known suffixes. Therefore, if you define a rule whose target is ‘.c.o’, make takes it to be a double-suffix rule with source suffix ‘.c’ and target suffix ‘.o’. Here is the old-fashioned way to define the rule for compiling a C source file:

    .c.o:
            $(CC) -c $(CFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) -o $@ $<
    

    Suffix rules cannot have any prerequisites of their own. If they have any, they are treated as normal files with funny names, not as suffix rules. Thus, the rule:

    .c.o: foo.h
            $(CC) -c $(CFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) -o $@ $<
    

    tells how to make the file.c.ofrom the prerequisite filefoo.h, and is not at all like the pattern rule:

    %.o: %.c foo.h
            $(CC) -c $(CFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) -o $@ $<
    

    which tells how to make ‘.o’ files from ‘.c’ files, and makes all ‘.o’ files using this pattern rule also depend onfoo.h.

    Suffix rules with no recipe are also meaningless. They do not remove previous rules as do pattern rules with no recipe (see Canceling Implicit Rules). They simply enter the suffix or pair of suffixes concatenated as a target in the data base.

    The known suffixes are simply the names of the prerequisites of the special target .SUFFIXES. You can add your own suffixes by writing a rule for .SUFFIXES that adds more prerequisites, as in:

    .SUFFIXES: .hack .win
    

    which adds ‘.hack’ and ‘.win’ to the end of the list of suffixes.

    If you wish to eliminate the default known suffixes instead of just adding to them, write a rule for .SUFFIXES with no prerequisites. By special dispensation, this eliminates all existing prerequisites of .SUFFIXES. You can then write another rule to add the suffixes you want. For example,

    .SUFFIXES:            # Delete the default suffixes
    .SUFFIXES: .c .o .h   # Define our suffix list
    

    The ‘-r’ or ‘--no-builtin-rules’ flag causes the default list of suffixes to be empty.

    The variable SUFFIXES is defined to the default list of suffixes before make reads any makefiles. You can change the list of suffixes with a rule for the special target .SUFFIXES, but that does not alter this variable.

  • 相关阅读:
    信息化基础建设 ORM 常见错误
    信息化基础建设 消息引擎
    Enterprise Library:日志的两种需求
    DDD:将概念显式化 之 验证规约
    技术人生:与其鸟宿檐下,不如击翅风雨
    DDD:传统三层架构向DDD的转换
    设计原则:意图导向编程的优点
    Entity Framework:数据库初始化的三种机制
    技术人生:使用价值观、原则和模式来理性的做设计和编程
    技术人生:人的差别在于业余时间
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/liujx2019/p/13049167.html
Copyright © 2011-2022 走看看